I know this is a long shot, but is there anybody out there who might have access to issues of Dental Management magazine from circa 1978? I believe there are some extremist classified ads in the back that I'd like to see.
Okay, this tweet had garnered far more interest than I ever imagined (some people appear to have followed me because of it!).
For those asking for more info, I really don't know more than the below. The main ad I'm looking for would be Tax Strike News, a tax protest newspaper.
Update: someone may have found the reference for me! I've seen a partial page, waiting for the whole page. Will post, and give credit/shoutout when that happens. Looks like the reference was not actually a classified ad but something else.
Isn't Twitter wild?
Update #2: Success! Or partial success! I owe a great debt of gratitude to @mparrnyc, who was able to find the digital page of Dental Management in question--from the April 1978 issue. But the success raises even more mysteries. Let me show you.
Matt had to take several screenshots of the page in question and send them to me. I have crudely put them in order and am showing them below. You'll see that Dental Management published a page-long list of groups & orgs that were variously 1) anti-tax or pro-tax reform, 2) from
the left-wing "war tax resistance" tax protest movement or 3) from the right-wing tax protest movement, which claims people have a legal/constitutional right not to pay federal income taxes. It's meant as a list of resources--though many of these are fringe at best.
It turns out, according to Matt, that this list came at the end of an article by Thomas Hoopes DDS of Salt Lake City titled "The Dentist Who Doesn't Pay Income Taxes." It appears that Dr. Hoopes is the dentist in question!
So what happens to a dentist who doesn't pay taxes? It appears he gets convicted! March 10, 1976, Provo (utah) Daily Herald. Of course, the Dental Management article was from 1978, so perhaps Hoopes did not learn his lesson?
Anyway, thanks to Matt and thanks to everybody else who offered to help or offered suggestions! You guys are the nice side of Twitter!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Warning: a typical Pitcavagean thread begins here. Read on at your own peril.
Note the phrase below, "we want our statement to resonate with the sheeple." The word "sheeple" is commonly used by people in the far right to refer to the American people, who passively believe
whatever the government/New World Over/media/Jews/Deep State/Name Yer Enemy tell them. When I began researching right-wing extremism in 1994 it was already on everybody's lips. Was it always this way, though? When did this phrase emerge? (or, given its simple construction, how
many different times did it independently emerge?"). Some words you can look up the etymology of, but slang terms are more difficult. However, you don't have to be an expert in order to do Internet sleuthing using Google Books and specifying various time ranges. The results
1. Secession efforts--which happen regularly--tend to bore me. But this one, promoted by Biedermann and the so-called Texas Nationalist Movement, is interesting (to
"Texas Lawmaker Kyle Biedermann Introduces Bill Aimed at Seceding from the Union"
2. me) largely because of the history of the latter. The TNM, headed by Daniel Miller, traces its history back to the 1990s and one of the factions of the Republic of Texas, an anti-government extremist sovereign citizen group that plagued the state at the time with sovereign
3. "paper terrorism" tactics and, in 1997, a kidnapping and armed standoff in west Texas at the (double-wide) "Embassy" for the group and its then-leader, Richard McLaren. In the 90s, Daniel Miller was "vice-president," then later "provisional president" of one of the Republic
The U.S. has a deep history of right-wing violence, so much so that many shocking incidents are largely forgotten. One such incident, which occurred in Woodburn, Oregon, in 2008, involved a father and son pair of anti-government extremists, Bruce and Joshua Turnidge.
The elder Turnidge, Bruce, once tried to start a militia and later told people the OKC bombing had been a good thing. Financial difficulties and fear that Obama would institute gun control caused them to decide to build a bomb with which to rob a bank, theoretically solving their
cash problems and allowing them to buy guns as well. Their harebrained scheme involved planting a bomb outside a bank, then phoning in a warning to clear people out. Apparently they thought they would then be able to rob it. Police were called in, but could find no bomb in the
This is a short, anecdotal thread about UFO-related "terrorism" in the United States. We tend to think of terrorism as being related to the far right, or the far left, or extremist religious movements, but fanatic belief in any cause can potentially result in violent acts.
By way of explanation, I was thinking about the Nashville bombing last night, which got me to thinking about other unusual bombings involving vehicles (as target or delivery vessel), one of which was related to a fringe religious group focused on UFOs.
The group in question is the Outer Dimensional Forces, which still exists and has been based in Weslaco in far south Texas since 1966. Its founder, Orville Gordon (who called himself Nodrog), built a UFO landing pad for ships that would land and save himself and his followers
There are three main contexts involving armed groups in which the word "militia" is used.
1. The historical/legal/statutory militia, which is referred to as "the militia," not as "militias." I simplify, but today it is basically the National Guard.
2. "Militias" as a *generic*
term for any non-actual-military armed group, particularly ones with a paramilitary bent to them (such as foreign examples like Shi'ite militias or Druse militias).
3. Paramilitary groups within the militia movement, a specific right-wing anti-government extremist movement.
The federal and state charges in the Michigan militia kidnapping plot are interesting; this is a thread about them. I should note I've tracked over 200 right-wing terrorist incidents in the U.S. (and many other r-w criminal incidents), which has given me some insight into how
common or rare certain charges or prosecutorial approaches are. I should note my background is in extremism, though--not the law.
The case is unusual in that it has "split" charges. Six of the defendants were charged federally, while the rest were charged by the state of
Michigan. In most cases, either the feds prosecute or the state prosecutes (often because the feds may not be interested in the case), but not both. There are also cases--typically involving high-profile extremist murders--where the feds and the state both prosecute the same