One of the enduring mysteries of corona-chan is how much institutional opposition there's been to cheap, low (or even zero) risk at-home treatments and prophylactics

All of the Approved Science has only ever been social controls, and a vaccine
It's not like this is the first and only vitamin D study. We've had them since *last spring*. You might even look to that bane of "trust the science," "using your own eyes," to see how the virus fares where people get lots of vitamin D from sunlight

Oh

There are multiple (entirely accidental!) studies showing that smoking is highly *protective* against corona, reducing hospitalizations/serious cases by like 70-80%

Yet I've heard multiple gov PSAs telling me smoking makes you *more vulnerable to it*

It's all very very strange
The above sounds counterintuitive, yet it's an enduring and consistent result, known since March 2020. It might not have been *entirely* crazy to slap every arm in a nursing home with a nicotine patch

Can't hurt. Might have made a big difference. Yet it sounds "insane." Why?
If pumping oldies full of nicotine isn't outright insane, then surely it's even less insane to recommend normal people take vitamin D, quercetin, zinc, etc

None of *that's* going to hurt you. I'm on month 12, + intend to keep taking quercetin for life (unrelated Bro Science win)
I don't actually think this is a conspiracy: that would imply these people know what they're doing

I do think that "the Science" has become such sclerotic, risk-averse hem-of-the-skirt-clutchers that it would rather let millions die than later be proven to be trivially wrong
The greatest lesson of the coronavirus should be that there's a ton of highly useful information out there that, for a host of reasons, the ruling channels never talk about

All alternative voices sound initially insane. And with total elite failure...
...it's now entirely on the individual to figure out which alternative voices are actually insane, and which are offering useful—potentially vital—information

If you're expecting that much of normal people, don't act shocked when it all breaks down

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS

Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @17cShyteposter

2 Feb
This piece documenting how the oligarch class funds vast networks of NGOs to coordinate progressive messaging, fabricate "data" and "science," and launder it through official channels is one of the most disturbing things I've read in a long time

spiked-online.com/2021/01/29/the…
This piece falls squarely into the category of "things you sort of already understood were happening but seeing it laid bare is like falling into a nightmare"
While 20th century democracy was hardly what you would call "organic," the 21st century model has been entirely captured by a tiny class of elites who carefully manufacture issues, moments, and crises while pretending this process is entirely "grassroots" and "people-driven"
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
One of Moldbug's key insights was that progs are in love with the GOP because it represents a form of liberalism that progressivism has already defeated

This prog doesn't hate free markets. She loves them, this is a tweet in favor of them. Why? Because they serve progressivism
If this sounds crazy, think what absolute free trade *means*. It means sending millions of manufacturing jobs to Mexico, or ideally China, because it's cheaper

I.e. it means globalism. And what is globalism but the erasure of distinct nations? Is that a *conservative* project?
Globalization means centralization, which means erasing all local cultural norms and replacing them with the values of the hegemon

Which is crazy, because if true it'd result in things like Gab/Parler being shut out by the hegemon—or the US President getting banned from the web
Read 5 tweets
20 Nov 20
If you were persuaded or reasoned from normiedom into the dissident right, it's easy to lose track of that process, and then assault those in the middle for their lameness

But never lose sight that you *were* talked into it: and it took more milquetoast types to get you there
Consider also that the "pipeline" is constantly fracturing: either breaking back toward the establishment (or with "Breadtube) even full leftism), or toward our ranks instead, as they either go deeper, or retreat towards the more comfortable position
In the current age, the center is the least stable point (what even is the "center" now, when everything is realigning?), because this is an age of extremes, and so people walk up to the brink, and then fracture towards the extremes—usually, but not always, to our side
Read 8 tweets
13 Nov 20
Learning that John Gardner's GRENDEL is a vicious takedown of Sartre makes me understand why I loved it even as a young prog, and already makes even the second page of my reread an order of magnitude funnier than when I first took it in
That's the greatest part of it as art—it's written so that by the end, you *do* pity Grendel. But you also believe the world is made a better place when

~SPOILER ALERT~

Beowulf rips his limbs off and leaves him for dead

This is very similar, dramatically, to how Tolkien treats Gollum

But in Tolkien's realm, where Christianity is still in charge, Gollum is also *physically* weak—an object of pity, but overpowered by mere hobbits, once they understand what they're up against
Read 6 tweets
16 Aug 20
21st century schizophrenic mindset arises from the triple realization that

1) the "guardians of the truth" are lying to you

2) there's no alternate authority out there who can tell you what the truth really is, and

3) there is no way to figure out the truth on your own
The result, as Barnes gets at, is you know *something* is wrong. But you have no way to know what the true scope or scale of the wrongness might be

It could be a trivial error—or it could be that everything you believe is a lie. And you have to decide which, over and over again
Determining when a lie of way-of-life has been told, and what to do in response, isn't something normal people can reliably do on their own

That's the role of kings and chiefs and inquisitor-priests. And even they only had to decide now and then, not every single fucking day
Read 5 tweets
16 Jun 20
The entire BLM movement is based on lies. But since it's backed by elite institutions who have no interest in actual truth—and who actively brainwash people to support their power in defiance of the truth—"voting" is exposed as a means of laundering power through "public opinion"
Good lord, he really is gonna get fired and have to start his own Joe Rogan thing, isn't he. What he's saying is indistinguishable from a dissident right groupchat whose opinions would get every single participant unpersoned.

Bless this man

Is there anything more revealing than the corpse of Jon Stewart getting trotted out every two years to push some ossified irrelevancy while Ol' Bowtie emerges as a political tour de force

"Clown nose on, clown nose off" was the most devastating own of the 21st century
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!