Nice thread by @BharadwajSpeaks. There is a long tradition of record-keeping by the Brahmins at Haridwar etc. This is a rich source of historical record which has not really been tapped.
It will be interesting to find the purohit of the "Sikh" Sodhis and when the records stop.
Exactly, this is what I meant. I suspect that it is only after Macaullife-Sikhi made by the British that they stopped going to Haridwar. Before that all records must be present of their purohits.
Cultivation of Hindu hate comes from the needs of colonialism and evangelism, which seeded the academic memes to study India in the last 150 years.
Colonialism fashioned a "Sikh identity" in opposition to "Hindu" to serve the needs of the British army.
To control a Hindu civilizational state, different groups had to be split to regard the Hindu as the "other." "Sikh" creation was literally done via the army, which excluded non-keshadharis and even non-jats.
This is Macauliffe on the British Army fashioning the "Sikh religion."
Similarly, for the conversion of Indian, the evangelicals had to set up different groups in opposition. People were rooted in their own traditions. To cut roots, hate was necessary.
So you say: 1. "Tribals" were never Hindu 2. Hindus oppressed you 3. "Hinduism" is for Brahmins
Hindu society was organized so that everyone thought they were "on top." It was a heterarchy not hierarchy. Brahmins assented to this colonial meme because *like everyone else* they also think they were "on top." So they went with the colonial narrative.
What about the vast majority of farmers who are happy with the laws and not protesting? You want a few anarchists to hold them to ransom? Elections are the way to decide if people and farmers support the laws.