125. Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in SARS-CoV-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design
via @TheSeeker268
"the claim that the polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 has been experimentally inserted is not too far‐fetched."
"The million-dollar question: would a bat coronavirus RatG13, isolated in 2021, have the functional polybasic furin site?" (or like a few years earlier?) via @TheSeeker268
127. Decoding Covid-19 with the SARS-CoV-2 Genome link.springer.com/article/10.100…
"arguments exist that challenge the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 and, instead, suggest that the virus may not have a natural origin."
128. Thanks for the reminder from @JohnGal52793009
"Vector sequences in early WIV SRA sequencing data of SARS-CoV-2 inform on a potential large-scale security breach at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic"
Daoyu Zhang @Daoyu15 ex- @flavinkins zenodo.org/record/4486195…
129. @netpoette is back with a comprehensive update
Frustrated by the superficiality & bias of recent press conferences about the possible #origin of #SARS-CoV-2? This article is extremely detailed & comprehensive & updated changingtimes.media/2020/10/12/sar…
130. Why China and the WHO Will Never Find a Zoonotic Origin For the COVID-19 Pandemic Virus
by Jonathan Latham, PhD and Allison Wilson, PhD independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/w…
131. Anon, A, Bostickson, B, & Demaneuf, G. (2021) Investigation into Wuhan Institute of Virology Pathogen Databases (Version 2). Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… zenodo.org/record/4512260…
24 Page on the Missing Databases
My first Paper but not my last, I can assure you!
132. A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived
Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl @quay_dr zenodo.org/record/4477081…
Massive 193 Pages
Includes a Free Zenodo Warning (never see that before)
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)
page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:
Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site
We need to find out why Peter Daszak & EcoHealth had In-Q-Tel backing and why Nathan Wolfe (an obvious intelligence asset with links to Epstein/Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, and Bill Gates) was on their editorial board.