125. Domains and Functions of Spike Protein in SARS-CoV-2 in the Context of Vaccine Design
via @TheSeeker268
"the claim that the polybasic furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 has been experimentally inserted is not too far‐fetched."
"The million-dollar question: would a bat coronavirus RatG13, isolated in 2021, have the functional polybasic furin site?" (or like a few years earlier?) via @TheSeeker268
127. Decoding Covid-19 with the SARS-CoV-2 Genome link.springer.com/article/10.100…
"arguments exist that challenge the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 and, instead, suggest that the virus may not have a natural origin."
128. Thanks for the reminder from @JohnGal52793009
"Vector sequences in early WIV SRA sequencing data of SARS-CoV-2 inform on a potential large-scale security breach at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic"
Daoyu Zhang @Daoyu15 ex- @flavinkins zenodo.org/record/4486195…
129. @netpoette is back with a comprehensive update
Frustrated by the superficiality & bias of recent press conferences about the possible #origin of #SARS-CoV-2? This article is extremely detailed & comprehensive & updated changingtimes.media/2020/10/12/sar…
130. Why China and the WHO Will Never Find a Zoonotic Origin For the COVID-19 Pandemic Virus
by Jonathan Latham, PhD and Allison Wilson, PhD independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/w…
131. Anon, A, Bostickson, B, & Demaneuf, G. (2021) Investigation into Wuhan Institute of Virology Pathogen Databases (Version 2). Zenodo. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… zenodo.org/record/4512260…
24 Page on the Missing Databases
My first Paper but not my last, I can assure you!
132. A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived
Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl @quay_dr zenodo.org/record/4477081…
Massive 193 Pages
Includes a Free Zenodo Warning (never see that before)
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.