A common genre of disaster tweet is someone making a snarky comment that blames disaster survivors for the disaster because of their state’s political affiliation.
This is a problem for several reasons but the big one is that generally the same communities that tend to be most impacted by disasters are the same ones that are most likely to be kept from voting.
I wrote about this a few months ago right before the election.
Mainers — including King— have a depth of understanding about what it’s like to have to make it through cold winters without the needed resources. It would be great to see that empathy extended to people who are trying to survive yet another disaster in the midst of a pandemic.
(It’s also pretty hypocritical to act like Mainers don’t vote for extremely shitty politicians who don’t take risk seriously and I would hope that folks in other states would help us next time we’re in need.)
Mainers aren’t allowed to criticize how other states vote until we figure out the second district. I thought we had agreed on this. Jeez
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Among the many horrific things Rush Limbaugh did and said he was also a persistent disaster denialist.
It's a long list but in the past few years, he actively encouraged people not to follow hurricane evacuation orders (while evacuating himself). buzzfeednews.com/article/davidm…
He persistently lied about climate change and their relationship to disasters.
This is another disaster where the needs are so geographically widespread that my best advice on giving is to just pick a person/group/ organization and give them money.
My personal approach in a situation like this is to do the following: 1. Help anyone I know personally who needs help 2. Donate to any groups I've worked with before/ know they're effective 3. Local groups that serve marginalized people that haven't gotten many donations
I do usually recommend donating to groups that work on recovery rather than response. I actually feel differently in this situation specifically because of the pandemic. So this isn't a factor I'm considering right now.
I often get comments about how my criticism of various democrats re: disasters is unfair because "at least they aren't Trump". 😅
Sure, democrats are not chucking paper towels at people but they also are not doing an effective job of meeting disaster-related needs.
What is happening right now is, unfortunately, a perfect example of why elected officials (national and local) need to explain the causes of disasters AND what they are going to do to prevent them in the future.
I’ve been thinking about how in the mid-sixties (or so) “the public” became disillusioned with the civil defense preparedness efforts as their inadequacies in the face of the nuclear threat became so obvious. It seems to me something similar is occurring now.
The public is looking for information on how to be prepared and what emergency management has to offer is, frankly, little more than “tips and tricks” about writing down phone numbers, etc.
Someone working in a small EM agency with little staff, time, and authority probably can’t do much more than offer these suggestions — even when they know, as they often do, it’s not enough.