COULD SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE US MONEY TO STUDY HOW CLIMATE CHANGE WILL IMPACT THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
We don't even need that much money to do this!
ok. I know I'm screaming but I'm actually 100% serious.
@BillGates -- I hear you're into climate adaptation now. Great! Give us money!!
There is so little money being spent on disaster research and there's even less being spent specifically on *emergency management*.
I'm just completely out of ways of trying to explain why this is urgent research! Look around!!
Y'all... I'm talking about *empirical* research that is built off of existing emergency management theory.
We're not doing this "lessons learned" nonsense.
There has to be a millionaire out there who feels guilty about their private jet emissions. Donate your guilt away. We just need to hire a team of grad students (with a liveable wage)!
Every time someone asks me a question about emergency management that I can't answer because it hasn't been studied I want to scream. I know how to get the answer to your question but I can't because there's no funding. This is such a solvable problem.
Here's a personal example of how extreme this problem is... I track all of my work hours and last year I spent 977 hours doing research.
None of it was funded except for one project that had a $1000 grant (it paid for two grad assistants). That's it.
I didn't think this many people would take an interest in this.
There's SO much disaster research. One problem we have is that so many disciplines do this work that we often talk past each other. One thing that emergency management researchers do is synthesize all this work.
Synthesizing existing research doesn't take much money (just salaries, really!) but it does take TIME. It's also not something that funders are interested in... yet, it's the work that has to be done to do theory building.
Then you get to go out and collect more data. THEN you get to bring the work into practice (ideally you're talking with them throughout the project). THEN you get to policy recommendations.
If you want *good* emergency management reform then you have to do all of this first.
If you've never done this kind of work you might think this sounds easy but it's not. It's hard, painstaking work, which takes TIME and a lot of hands (minds). There are people who WANT to do this work. There is not funding to pay them to do this work.
That's wrong.
Anyway, if you want to check out some disaster research in 2018 I posted one journal article a day for the whole year. It's just a sampling but you can check it out here:
Among the many horrific things Rush Limbaugh did and said he was also a persistent disaster denialist.
It's a long list but in the past few years, he actively encouraged people not to follow hurricane evacuation orders (while evacuating himself). buzzfeednews.com/article/davidm…
He persistently lied about climate change and their relationship to disasters.
This is another disaster where the needs are so geographically widespread that my best advice on giving is to just pick a person/group/ organization and give them money.
My personal approach in a situation like this is to do the following: 1. Help anyone I know personally who needs help 2. Donate to any groups I've worked with before/ know they're effective 3. Local groups that serve marginalized people that haven't gotten many donations
I do usually recommend donating to groups that work on recovery rather than response. I actually feel differently in this situation specifically because of the pandemic. So this isn't a factor I'm considering right now.
I often get comments about how my criticism of various democrats re: disasters is unfair because "at least they aren't Trump". 😅
Sure, democrats are not chucking paper towels at people but they also are not doing an effective job of meeting disaster-related needs.
What is happening right now is, unfortunately, a perfect example of why elected officials (national and local) need to explain the causes of disasters AND what they are going to do to prevent them in the future.
A common genre of disaster tweet is someone making a snarky comment that blames disaster survivors for the disaster because of their state’s political affiliation.
This is a problem for several reasons but the big one is that generally the same communities that tend to be most impacted by disasters are the same ones that are most likely to be kept from voting.
I wrote about this a few months ago right before the election.
I’ve been thinking about how in the mid-sixties (or so) “the public” became disillusioned with the civil defense preparedness efforts as their inadequacies in the face of the nuclear threat became so obvious. It seems to me something similar is occurring now.
The public is looking for information on how to be prepared and what emergency management has to offer is, frankly, little more than “tips and tricks” about writing down phone numbers, etc.
Someone working in a small EM agency with little staff, time, and authority probably can’t do much more than offer these suggestions — even when they know, as they often do, it’s not enough.