"We petition the American Academy of Pediatrics to renounce its scientifically unsupported 'affirmative' policy for young people with gender dysphoria." Interesting petition given role of guidelines/policies in promoting gender hormone drugs & surgery. 1/ change.org/p/american-aca…
Gender clinic hormonal treatments for under-18s are based on "low quality" evidence, according to reviews of the medical literature, including the first systematic review by Chew et al 2018 published in the AAP's official journal. blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotligh…
In the absence of high quality evidence for gender medicine, treatment guidelines & position statements from medical associations take on more significance -- and they have their critics.
Psychologist @JamesCantorPhD fact-checked the AAP policy & argued its endorsement of the medicalised "affirmative" treatment model was contrary to the evidence on gender dysphoria (GD) in minors, which he said the AAP had misrepresented.
Cantor said: "In its policy statement, AAP told neither the truth nor the whole truth, committing sins both of commission & of omission, asserting claims easily falsified by anyone caring to do any fact-checking at all".
Cantor also said AAP had conflated sexual orientation with gender dysphoria & ignored the outcome of multiple studies suggesting the majority of children with gender dysphoria would grow out of it by puberty -- without medical intervention.
Cantor's paper raised serious questions about the AAP policy, so last year I sought comment from the academy, but it reportedly did "not want to engage in a back-and-forth debate" & felt its policy "speaks for itself". Officially, the academy wouldn't comment.
Psychologist Ken Zucker, an international authority on gender dysphoria & journal editor, also believed the AAP policy to be badly flawed, saying: “When I’m in a cynical mode I sometimes joke around & say, ‘if you don’t do research, you write guidelines’.” theaustralian.com.au/nation/drugs-f…
In October 2019 American paediatrician Julia Mason went public on the popular blog KevinMD with her concerns about medicalised gender change with children & the risk of regret. kevinmd.com/blog/2019/10/a…
Mason, an adviser with the gender clinic watchdog group segm.org, told me back then she was "shocked & dismayed" by the AAP pro-affirmative policy & doubted 11-13 year-olds could grasp the significance of starting down this medical path. theaustralian.com.au/nation/drugs-f…
So, what is the likely response to a petition calling on the AAP to revisit its pro-affirmative policy?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"(Victoria's anti-conversion therapy bill), which could mean up to a decade in jail or fines of almost $10,000 for anyone found trying to suppress or change another person’s sexuality or gender identity, passed by 27-9 votes late on Thursday." 1/ theaustralian.com.au/nation/politic…
Not a surprise, given the numbers. More significant, I think, was hearing several Australian MPs literate in the Tavistock court ruling, risks to minors in "affirmative" gender clinics, questions of consent to gender transition, & the emergence of regretful "detransitioners".
In the debate, some MPs, notably Liberal Democrat David Limbrick, tried to tease out the logic & possible consequences of this use of coercive state power. What does it mean to "change or suppress" sexuality or gender identity? He worried aloud about real-world scenarios.
"Overcoming the flesh: the transgender movement wants to legally abolish physical sex. Risks and side effects are kept silent" | Big-hit 1400-word report in Germany's influential centre-right newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine @faznet#GenderClinics 1/ zeitung.faz.net/faz/feuilleton…
"(The @FDP party & Greens) have presented drafts for a (gender) self-determination law that for long stretches seem as if they were written by the activists themselves. At age 14, everyone should be able to decide each year whether they are legally to be considered man or woman."
Germany is the latest country to launch a dissident LGB group in protest & alarm at what they see as the capture of establishment LGBT organisations by the radical project to topple biological sex & erect self-declared "gender identity" in its place.
"Doctors and psychiatrists want the Andrews government (in the Australian state of Victoria) to make changes to its plan to ban gay conversion therapy, due to concerns it will discourage some practitioners from treating vulnerable patients." theage.com.au/politics/victo…
This is significant criticism from the main medical body @amavictoria & college of psychiatry @RANZCP, which calls out the conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity that is the hallmark of activist-driven "conversion therapy" bans globally.
This concern raised by the college's Victorian branch is also interesting because the RANZCP's own policy arguably involves a more general, Queer Theory-style conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity. ranzcp.org/news-policy/po…
Two courts on the opposite side of the world recently made decisions on children & puberty blocker drugs which stop natural development. In the English case, the High Court said it was "highly unlikely" that a child 13 or under could consent to this "experimental" treatment. 1/
In Australia, the court decided it was in the "best interests" of a 12 year-old to begin puberty blockers to prevent "life-long damaging masculinisation". Born a boy, the child identifies as female.
Both rulings came down in December 2020 but a key difference is that the English court was considering whether children could give informed consent to their own treatment, while the Australian judge allowed doctors to proceed with the mother consenting on behalf of the child.
In Australia, public media outlet @abcnews has showcased children's hospital gender medicine for years. This treatment was found to be "experimental" in Keira Bell's court challenge to the UK Tavistock clinic. The ruling has global significance, but not on the ABC website.
Even before the Tavistock ruling, the UK had adopted a more cautious approach to this medicalisation. Finland & Sweden have edged away from the "gender affirming" medical model used in Oz. The pioneering Dutch clinic has expressed concern about a shift in patient profile.
But Australian readers were told back in April this was just a rightwing culture war, and that the gender medical model had prevailed. Now this Melbourne newspaper has had a "struggle session" with staff angry it ran the story of a worried (& obviously not bigoted) parent.
An American appeals court has ruled that "conversion therapy" bans offend the First Amendment right to free speech in the constitution. Here's a news report with the basic facts -- and significant omissions. This case looks important. THREAD
The two therapists who challenged the "conversion therapy" bans say they offer counselling: just talking. The Florida authorities lawmakers argue this does serious psychological harm to minors.
But these restrictive "ordinances" give a green light to one form of counselling. This "carveout" is a hallmark of the new-wave "LGBT conversion therapy" bans being pushed by "gender identity" activists around the world.