I don't think there is anyone in this govt. able to smooth UK/EU relations (they are now confrontational by nature, & will remain so until there is a change of govt).
However, in @DavidGHFrost, govt. have put the most qualified person they have in charge of the relationship. No-one in govt. knows the TCA as well as him, & he is clearly attuned to what the PM wants.
And by making him a Minister, Parl. will have more opportunities to scrutinise him & govt's. approach to the EU relationship. This move allows for a little more transparency (although don't expect govt. to suddenly become an open book).
I also wonder, amongst all the other issues that wld have been pt of the thinking behind this decision, whether this needed to be done to free-up Gove's bandwidth. Everything seems to go through him, & he will be doing some heavy lifting soon on Sco. Needs the EU off his plate.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sydney Nash

Sydney Nash Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NashSGC

18 Feb
Some thoughts on David Frost following his elevation to the Cabinet, why he is perfectly qualified for the job and why that doesn’t mean relations with the EU will improve or that the flaws in the TCA that so many businesses have been pointing out will go away.
First, his qualifications. No-one is better placed on Whitehall to manage future relations with the EU.
This isn't because Frost will crisscross the continent, repairing relations, & befriending leaders from Berlin to Bucharest, & Rome to Riga, but because future relations with the EU will be confined to the frameworks set out in the TCA & the Protocol, treaties Frost negotiated.
Read 15 tweets
25 Jan
It has been less than a month since the UK left the single market and the customs union, and the result has been chaos.
Fishers are anchoring their ships and halting the catch because they can no longer sell their product in the EU. Produce is being left to rot because an enormous increase in paperwork means it cannot get to market quickly enough.
Hauliers are stuck in queues at the border or left stranded in the cold and wet in some bleak lorry park in Kent.
Read 51 tweets
15 Jan
It takes some cheek to write a headline like this.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/01/1…
Maybe I wasn't listening properly, but I don't recall Brexiteers spending the last four and a half years setting out all the many problems that would be created by Brexit.
Admittedly, they have consistently railed against the protocol, but then again, those Brexiteers in Parliament also enthusiastically voted for it.
Read 6 tweets
6 Jan
So the government is going to ask business yet again, what rules it wants to scrap. Another in a long line of “red tape challenges” and I’ve lived through a few.
The thing is, every time government did this (at least during my time), businesses came back with few ideas about the red tape they wanted to be cut.
Chances are, the same thing will happen again. (If you keep doing the same thing, the same way, expect the same result).
Read 16 tweets
30 Nov 20
This is so misleading.

There is no legal provisions available to extend the status quo (i.e. the transition). The deadline for doing this passed on 1st July. That's it. Opportunity gone. Now the only options are to end transition with a deal, or without a deal.
Here's the relevant provision from the Withdrawal Agreement.

eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…
So the only way now to extend the status quo is to create a new legal base in international law that make provision for this. This can only be done by:
Read 8 tweets
28 Nov 20
I have to admit that I am completely bemused by the debate on how Labour should vote on an EU trade deal (assuming we get one), for two reasons.
The first is the politics. Voting against is a trap. It’s a vote against Brexit (at least that’s how the Conservatives will portray it).
It is also a vote for no-deal, which wld go against every position Labour has taken on Brexit since 2016.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!