What does the Kremlin think #Navalny's weak points are and how does that inform its current pressure campaign? Fascinating piece by @baunov. Quick thread 1/ carnegie.ru/commentary/838…
Baunov points out the effectiveness of the Kremlin's ongoing effort to disparage Navalny as a tool of Western intelligence services bent on provoking a street revolution. "This [claim] may sound preposterous, but it will resonate with certain segments of the public." 2/
Well-publicized state-sponsored violence and forced video confessions may shock people in the West, but they're also a deliberate attempt to make Russians think twice about the higher cost the regime will make them to pay for engaging in unsanctioned political activity. 3/
Navalny's team are incredibly skillful at appealing to younger Russian and creating viral content, but it's harder to overcome the quirks of Russian demography (aging population, smallish numbers of under-25s) 4/
Russian polling seems to confirm Navalny's overall support inside Russia (approx 20% of voters) hasn't surged in the wake of a state-sponsored assassination attempt, the street protests, or ongoing show trials. Did Navalny and his team expect a bigger bounce in public opinion? 5/
Finally, the Kremlin knows who its voters are and how to take care of them. To avoid blowing through $600 billion in hard currency reserves, the Kremlin has dribbled out programs aimed at the large segment of the population that's politically inert and happy to receive hand-outs
Of course, Putin's political team knows full well that average Russians are plenty grumpy at the moment. So they're braced for surprises at the ballot box in the autumn Duma elections. But they're far less worried than you might think END. carnegie.ru/commentary/838…
Don't let the hoopla over first Biden-Putin phone call overshadow the fact that White House is underlining the fact of Russian interference in the 2020 presidential election (not/not 2016) 1/ whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
The Kremlin, relying on a network led by a known Russian intelligence agent named Andrii Derkach, successfully mounted an influence operation to tilt the outcome of the election by spreading false information about @JoeBiden and his family. 2/
That operation (outlined here: home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…) didn't rely on the sexy online and social media tools seen in 2016 but it successfully ensnared Donald Trump, @RudyGiuliani, @DonaldJTrumpJr, and many parts of the pro-GOP media apparatus. 3/
How were the #Navalny demonstrations across Russia on Saturday different from past waves of mass protest? @Baunov breaks it down and challenges some of the wishful thinking that is now in circulation.
For example: @Baunov says the protest was less about supporting Navalny personally and more about public anger "about the Kremlin's lawlessness and the usurpation of power of allowing President Vladimir Putin to effectively remain in the job for life"
The make-up of the demonstrations is also important: "the most militant protesters didn’t look like the typical supporters of pro-democracy protests...[they mostly] work in the service sector or office jobs and are [people] dissatisfied with their jobs, salaries, and prospects"
Are we listening enough to average Russians? Nope! Thread on @CarnegieRussia-@levada_ru focus groups on political change, enduring appeal of paternalism, "strong hand," govt control over economy, wealth redistribution 1/ carnegie.ru/2021/01/14/how… @AndrKolesnikov/D.Volkov/A.Levinson
Anger over official corruption was a constant theme. But not necessarily in the way you'd expect -- eg the desire for Chinese-style solutions and "Stalinist methods" among tradition-minded participants. 2/
These folks support Putin's foreign policy, no questions asked. But they want the government to pivot to addressing domestic ills laid bare by the pandemic. 3/
1/ Surely a coincidence that Putin is asked at the 22:30 mark of today’s interview whether the US election result is actually legitimate.
2/ “The legitimacy or illegitimacy of the authorities is first of all up to the Americans themselves”
3/ “[The legitimacy] of the election is an extremely important thing because upon that depends the trust of the people on both sides [of political system] toward their leadership.”
1/ The Kremlin’s anti-Biden subtweeting continues apace: Russian electoral commission head Pamfilova explains (once again) why US vote-by-mail system is irreparably flawed and rife with fraud...
2/ ... to prove her assertions are grounded in, uh, truthfulness she cites US election expert Greg Butterfield.
3/...it took me a few minutes to figure out she was taking about this fellow: he’s an NY-based far left/sextant activist who contributes to something called Struggle-La Lucha and whose Twitter handle is “[at]redguard1971” google.com/amp/s/www.stru…
1/ Well worth watching Putin's comments about Hunter Biden on Russian TV last night. They're very troubling. Contrary to what's been reported, Putin is very much trying to keep the story alive. russian.rt.com/russia/article…
2/ First question: what do you know about Trump's claim at the most recent debate that Hunter Biden had a business relationship with the widow of former Moscow mayor Yuriy Luzhkov? (Baturina is not a nobody: she was long Russia's richest woman.)
3/ Putin theatrically claims he knows nothing (so uninformed, really?). He goes on to imply a relationship is plausible b/c Baturina had all sorts of foreign business partners. Putin could have simply said this story has zero basis (eg buzzfeednews.com/article/christ…@ChristopherJM)