Share this page!

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Twitter logo
18 Feb, 5 tweets, 3 min read
OM Vashat Karaya Namaha🙏
Today reached out to several Hon'ble Retd Justices of Supreme Court and High Court to support the legal opinion of Justice Siva Sankara Rao on the Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) Chilkur Balaji Art 26 Deity Rights dispute
As the Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) Hindu Deity Rights dispute is pending with His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn Retd Justices can express their opinion to His Excellency. We request devotees to reach out to devout Retd Justices in this regard
pgurus.com/a-letter-to-th…
In addition to Hon'ble MPs we are reaching out to Ancient Mathas and Retd Justices of Supreme Court and High Court to support the dharmik opinion of Justice Siva Sankara Rao described by eminent jurists as "Great" "Amazing" etc. Devotees can help us in this divine activity. ImageImageImageImage
धर्मेण हन्यते व्याधिः हन्यन्ते वै तथा ग्रहाः।
धर्मेण हन्यते शत्रुः यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः
It is by following Dharma that we gain victory over diseases
Let us ensure victory of Dharma pious purpose of #Ayyappajyothi as our well-being as a Nation depends on it.
धर्मेण हन्यते व्याधिः हन्यन्ते वै तथा ग्रहाः।
धर्मेण हन्यते शत्रुः यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
21 Feb
In view of imp of resolving Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) Hindu Deity Rights dispute for well-being of Nation esp with fear of second covid wave can His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn seek Art 74 advise of council of ministers within a time limit?
ImageImageImage
We are trying to secure guidance of Hon'ble Justice (Retd) of SC and High Court on whether His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn can put time limit for securing advise of Council of Ministers u Art 74 to ensure timely resoln of Art 363 Hindu Deity rights dispute
We have been advised that spirit of recommendation of time limit of 3 months for Hon'ble President to resp on assent of Bills ref by Governor by commission on review of working of constitution is applicable and His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn can guide the council of ministers Image
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
20 Feb
Appeal to Hon'ble (Retd) Justices of SC & High Court to provide suitable advise as per Constitutional Morality inclusive of Raja-Dharma to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn for resolution of Art 363 Hindu Deity Right dispute & ensure well-being of our Nation
ImageImage
"Nation is faced with an interesting situation where very embodiment of Dharma has posed a question to wriggle out from its peril...I would fail in my duty as a person who is trained to address such questions...if I do not offer my opinion for guidance..."
pgurus.com/a-letter-to-th…
There are articles being written in foreign media India is becoming Hindu State etc .nothing can be further than truth Chilkur Balaji Deity Rights Movement just to secure equal treatment as is done for Prince of Arcot for Deities to reclaim rights should put such doubts at rest. Image
Read 4 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
23 Jan
Farmers protest started on 26th Nov continuing still giving sleepless nights to Govt about 26th Jan tractor rally?
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution in force
Restoring Art 26 rights will please Lord Sri Krishna inner controller of Farmers & please the Farmers👇
Above suggestion based on AP Founders Association rep to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn where Feb 10th adharmik dismissal of Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity petition to restore Art 26 Deity rights by SC has been identified as root cause for Delhi troubles w many protests incl farmers
AP Founders Association historic rep to His Excellency has drawn parallel between how capital city of Madurai was impacted due to adharmik judgement in Kannagi case & how Delhi is impacted due to series of protests with latest Farmers one post Feb 10th dismissal of Deity petition
Read 8 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
22 Jan
In a democracy people belonging to other denominations and non-believers can come to power so Hindu Temple admin cannot be under Secular Govt control the reasoning for Deity's constitutional mandate which is as per Dharma and is also the spirit of Art 26.

The thinking of Constituent Assembly on what is meaning of "secular state" is clear from this note published by Dr Rajendra Prasad in his capacity as Chairman explaining salient features of the Constitution.

Deity's mandate was fully protected by Constituent Assembly u Art 26
What happened in Sabarimala Temple on Jan 2nd 2019 is breach of Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) read w Art 26 When Secular State in violation of Dharma replaced its will over will of Deity that was duly recorded by Kerala HC in its 1991 judgement
opindia.com/2019/01/four-p…
Read 5 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
21 Jan
Reclaim Art 26 Hindu Deity Rights & #FreeHinduTemples
Hindu Deities having ZERO constitutional rights => Hindu Dharmika Sampradaya having no Art 26 constitutional rights while other religions enjoy same.
#FreeHinduTemples w ZERO Hindu Deity Rights is no freedom
#FreeHinduTemples w Hindu Deity Rights our goal
thehindu.com/news/national/…
Our approach to #FreeHinduTemples with Art 26 Hindu Deity Rights is the same path articulated by Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha with guidance of Pujya Swami Dayananda Saraswati
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
12 Jan
If only SC had constituted such a committee to verify Dr MVS' contention on behalf of Telangana Archaka Samakhya that draconian AP 30/87 Act was unconstitutional and would deprive right to life of Archaka community and then decided constitutionality of Act
The Govt appointed committee report annexure details orders of SC in 1997 after SC appointed committee submitted its report. It could have stayed the operation of Act for low income temples till AP Govt made suitable amendments to draconian Act even though it acknowledged mistake
Even after about 25 years after the above order the AP Govt is yet to implement the 1997 order of SC. If the SC waited for committee report before declaring Act constitutional or atleast stay its operation for low income temples when reality was before it lot of distress avoided.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @csranga has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @csranga!

Read all threads by @csranga