My written testimony for today's @USCC_GOV hearing on cross-Strait deterrence is now available on the commission's web site. You can see it here: uscc.gov/sites/default/…
If you've been following me for a while, you'll see some familiar themes, as well as some new material and information.
My overall assessment of the state of cross-Strait deterrence, which is underlaid in large part by the associated military balance, is that we're entering a period of deep uncertainty.
This is in contrast to the situation of in the past, when I would have predicted failure for the PRC in any cross-Strait military aggression. It's also in contrast to the situation, absent changes in current trends, that we seem headed towards: PRC military domination of Taiwan.
The trends that concern me most are not those directly tied to comparisons across the Strait. What I'm most concerned about is China’s development of broader regional capabilities clearly intended to counter or deter a U.S. intervention to defend Taiwan.
These broader counter-intervention capabilities are most visible in the form of China’s deployment of large numbers of capable precision-strike Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles (IRBMs), its growing long-range bomber force, and its rapidly growing blue-water navy.
I've explored China's precision-strike IRBM force here before, in this thread:
One new piece of information that I provided to the Commission was this: it appears, based on open-source imagery, that China's missile forces may be developing the ability to strike specific high-value aircraft on U.S. air bases in the region.
This previously-unpublished image, from the missile impact range in western China, shows what appears to be a mock target specifically designed to imitate a parked E-3 Sentry airborne early warning and control aircraft (AWACS).
IMO the use of a mock target to represent a specific U.S. aircraft type (no one else in the region operates them) may indicate the development of a warhead with the capability to recognize and home in on specific aircraft, rather than having to blanket an entire airfield.
It also provides yet another indicator that China's missile force is practicing, quite specifically, attacks on U.S. bases in the region. My colleague Javier Gonzalez and I talked about this in detail in our report "First Strike" in 2017:cnas.org/publications/r…
The next topic, on China's growing bomber force, is one that I've also discussed here:
And finally, I address China's very rapidly growing navy, which I addressed here:
For the remainder of my detailed assessment and policy recommendations, please go take a look! uscc.gov/hearings/deter…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Shugart

Thomas Shugart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tshugart3

17 Feb
Any ideas out there on what this new building is near the Hambantota port in Sri Lanka?

It's pretty big, over 300m long. Most recent image is from 8-2020, with other images from earlier in and before construction.
Here it is in relation to the port. You can see how big it is in perspective.
I somehow never noticed this before. Apparently a few years back before it got overgrown and altered, it was a clearer "China SLK", indicating a China-Sri Lanka joint venture, comity, etc.
Read 5 tweets
16 Feb
As I said within this article, “When seen in combination with the ongoing major expansion of China’s nuclear submarine shipyard capacity, an expansion of China’s diesel submarine production capacity as well may point toward...
...a strong effort to try to erode the advantage in undersea warfare that the U.S. and its allies currently enjoy.”
Here's a comparison of the rough size (as best I can tell) of the two shipyards, the older one in green and the newer one (roughly 8X larger) in red. ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
16 Feb
Current situation: Image
UPDATE: a spicy fight Image
How it went: sound on to hear Fleet Commander calling targets, issuing orders to our 180-person fleet. And watch me trying desperately to keep up as enemy ships are killed before I can even target them...
Read 6 tweets
4 Jan
A few thoughts about tugs:

As I've been reading Beans, Bullets, and Black Oil, a 1952 book about logistics in the Pacific in WWII, I've been struck how often the topic of tugs has come up: ships that were saved because of their presence, or perhaps lost due to their absence.
Some examples that jumped right out: that the carrier USS Yorktown might have been saved at Midway, had the Navy yet appreciated the value of fleet tugs.
That the carrier USS Hornet and destroyer USS Porter might have been saved at the Battle of the Santa Cruz islands if tugs had been available:
Read 15 tweets
2 Jan
Logging in and getting ready for what promises to be one of the largest multiplayer virtual fleet battles in history:
We already have 6000+ players logged on in our alliance's forward staging area, just waiting to go into the fight. My corporation has already sent in a 256-person fleet, and is forming up four more to go soon:
Finally undocked, fleet standing by for orders.
Read 10 tweets
2 Dec 20
Here's a 3-part axiom I think US defense thinkers & planners should consider in devising concepts for the defense of US/allied vital interests in the Western Pacific.

Plans for major conflict against the PLA should not rely on any of the following to win:
- Units or forces that require anything but episodic communication or data flow.

(Ex.: UxVs that rely on consistent human oversight to do their job, esp. given current policy restraints on lethal autonomous weapons.)
- Any important fixed and hard-to-repair object or facility on or within the 2nd island chain.

(Ex.: fuel tanks, HQ buildings, repair facilities, comms equipment, etc.)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!