2/ First, re: those who in their wayward moral obtuseness feel we "can't speak ill of the dead." I've said that this is what abuse enablers say, but I hear that some religious traditions preach this. Oy.
So there's this:
4/ There's definitely a Jewish Tradition angle for how to treat evil people who die: the only respect is to justice, right & wrong, and above all compassion's existence necessitates condemning cruelty
5/ We're coming up on #Purim, and that's all about how to remember evil. There may be a reason, then, that I share the attitude of many other people committed to righting wrongs:
9/ That's personally why I can't understand "he was funny" - that's the bleat of people who laugh along with the bully when he crushes vulnerable people.
Really, examine yourself if you laughed along with him. It's not 'humor'
Seriously, how can someone say they listened to him with fondness? This is inexcusable immoral poison.
13/ And, like Trump (ym'sh) he mocked people with disabilities. In the clip below, he's gesticulating his arms around in order to mock Michael J. Fox’s Parkinson's.
Do people understand that anyone who does that is the worst sort of person?
14/ So who actually defends silence, and implicitly projects they defend all of the above cruelty? People like this guy who I was told to read during the election because of polling knowledge
16/ This will be it for now. We're at a moment when RedHats and other cruel fascists are trying to scurry under the garbage pits to avoid social stigma that they avoided when Trump (ym'sh) commanded the culture. Defending Rush is a sign of grotesque rot.
17/ If needed, I'll add more. But there's just so much filth I can stare at, even if the goal is justice. How much evil do you need to see before concluding it's unacceptable? My limit is very low.
31.98/ #Parsha thought: is there any two parshiyot where there's a more jarring transition in topic and tone than between #Mishpatim and #Terumah? The whole Torah changes, even. From a set of stories and comprehensible laws to: Architecture! Gold weirdness!
31.99/ Just found out that Dr. Meir Tamari z'l passed away Jan 20, 2021. Just so many leaders in Modern Orthodoxy are being lost this past year.
31.52b/ This is a continuation of the week 31 (Feb. 13-19) thread which is getting too big for stable threading. This is an experiment for this week: to split a thread when it gets to 50 or so.
31.02/ I have too much to say post-Impeachment but Goldman's thread helped me understand the sound trial attorney thinking behind not calling witnesses. Yet therein lies their error: Impeachment is a political process not legal. It was bad politics IMO.
31.03/ So many topics over the past 2 wks that've blooped by me because I was sick, so I guess I'll run thru a few of them. Superbowl: Brady can't be the GOAT b/c he's been repeatedly caught cheating. The biggest story, to me, is why his crimes have been normalized & lauded.
30.02/ Generally, when there's a debate in American culture to make something that's against halakha legal, I'll davka support its legality b/c (a) more freedom means I'll get to practice my own religion freely & (b) ironically, mitzvah points are given for free willed restraint
1/ Another #Beshalach thread, sparked by the linked article. What do combat exoskeletons have to do with the parsha? The halakhot of cybernetics on Shabbat, of course.
OK, so that's still pretty unclear. It has to do with the manna.
2/ Can you do melacha using invisible brain power, basically. Normally, I'd love to delve into how the regnant rabbinic view about gramma (causality) drives me utterly bonkers in its #Literalist mentality, as well as the limited 19th Century view of electricity, but not this week
3/ Cybernetics aka invisible brain power applies to the manna b/c:
"Rav Avraham Walkin ... argued that someone who miraculously cooks through thought or speech violates a biblical prohibition ... [he] proves this from the man (manna) that the Jews ate in the Desert"
1/ Were the Trump (ym'sh) supporters I know always cruel/evil/crazy? IMO, no, and I'd even say to suggest they were has shades of essentialism, an almost biological view of character. Or even physics: that there's potential evil and when it's expressed, it's kinetic evil.
2/ As expected, I see things behaviorally and culturally: they weren't this bad beforehand because:
(a) society kept them in check; Trump (ym'sh) as head of the nation & culture gave permission for previously taboo acts and with the guardrails removed, their impulses went wild.
3/ And (b) as their permission structure/cultural model became threatened, the subconscious recognition that social stigma was about to come crashing down made them more desperate and crazed.
They act and acted like addicts about to lose their fix.