THREAD: Thirteen, Unlucky for Some!

As the Feast of Purim draws nigh, some fun with numbers and gematria.
In the book of Esther, Haman repeatedly threatens the Jews with ‘destruction’ (אבד).

His act of genocide is scheduled (by lot) for a specific day: the 13th of Adar.
In ANE literature, the concept of ‘favourable days’ is a well known one.

For instance, Nebuchadnezzar is known to have started to rebuild Borsippa’s tower ‘in a favourable month, on a favourable day’ (i-na ITI ša-al-mu i-na UD ŠEGA).
P.S. If someone could explain to me why A. George (not a bad Assyriologist) has «šemê» rather than «mitgāru» for še.GA, I’d be grateful.
Anyway...

Haman clearly thinks the 13th Adar will turn out to be a favourable day for him,

but he’s badly mistaken; it will be a decidedly *unfavourable* day for him.
And his downfall will involve the convergence of all sorts of different occurrences of the number 13 in the book of Esther.

🔹 His nemesis, Esther, arises in a 13th month (2.12).

🔹 His final end is described in the text of 9.12,

which consists of 26 = 13 x 2 words,
...and involves the book’s 13th occurrence of the root אבד = ‘destroy’.

🔹 The particular form of the verb ‘destroy’ employed in 9.12 (ואבד) has a gematrial value of 13.

🔹 The death of Haman’s sons takes the tally of people impaled on a stake in the book of Esther to 13
(i.e., Bigthan, Teresh, Haman, and Haman’s 10 sons).

🔹 And Haman’s line comes to an unseemly end on the 13th day of the 13th year of the king’s reign (3.7, 12, 9.1ff.).

If the relevant year was intercalated, it may even have taken place in a 13th month (i.e., a second Adar).
Gematria also plays a role elsewhere in the book.

That Esther and Haman’s rivalry replays the rivalry between Saul (Esther’s infamous ancestor) and Agag (Haman’s infamous ancestor) is well known,
and explains why the book goes to such lengths to emphasise how Esther—unlike Saul—declines to take any ‘plunder’ from her enemy (9.10, 15, 16).
The connection between Esther, Saul, and Agag is emphasised by means of gematria.

🔹 The first (anticipatory) reference to Esther occurs in 2.4—והנערה—a word with a gematrial value of 336.
🔹 The word ‘Purim’ (פורים) also has a gematrial value of 336.

🔹 The particular ‘Purim’ cast by Haman rule out the first 336 days of the calendar year (1st Nisan to 12th Adar inclusive).
🔹 And, as a result of the Purim in question, the date set for Haman’s showdown with the Jews is the 337th day of the calendar year,
which hints at the book’s background and significance,

since both the title ‘Saul’ (שאול) and the title ‘Agag the king of Amalek’ (אגג מלך עמלק) have a gematrial value of 337.

THE END.

#NumbersAndTheBible

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon

James Bejon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

9 Feb
THREAD: Once More into the Details of Judas’s Death.

SUB-TITLE: An embarrassment to inerrantists or an embarrassment of riches?

SPOILER: I’m of the latter view. I do, however, think Judas’s death presents inerrantists with a challenge, just not the normal one.
As is well known, Matthew and Luke provide us with different accounts of Judas’s death.

Matthew has Judas hang himself in a field purchased by the chief priests,

while Luke has Judas’s body burst open in a field purchased by Judas himself (cp. Matt. 27.3–8, Acts 1.18–19).
The discrepancies between the two accounts raise at least a couple of important questions.

First, if Matthew and Luke’s accounts are historically reliable, then why do they read so differently?
Read 57 tweets
4 Feb
<THREAD>

David is a well known foreshadow/forerunner of Jesus.

A Judahite from Bethlehem, a man appointed to look after his father’s flock, a conqueror of Israel’s enemies: so the list goes on.

Less well known, however, is the way David foreshadows a Messiah who *suffers*.
The OT is replete with foreshadows/pictures of the life of Jesus.

Due to David’s many victories in life, it’s easy to think of David as a slightly one-dimensional picture of Jesus:
David is the Messiah who conquers (in which sense his reign pictures Jesus’ return),

while other OT characters depict a Messiah who *suffers* (e.g., Joseph, the prophets, etc.).
Read 51 tweets
28 Jan
THREAD: Numbers and Multiple Sources in Scripture.

Consider Judges 20’s battle narrative:

400,000 gathered Israelites,

700 Gibeahites defended by 26,000 Benjaminites,

22,000 Israelite casualties,

25,000 Benjaminite casualties, etc., etc.

Why all the numbers, Samuel?
In what follows, I’ll try to offer some suggestions.

(Image from deseret-dot-com.)
Judges 19’s narrative about a Levite and his concubine culminates in one of the bleakest and most horrific scenes in all of Scripture.

@DrPJWilliams has a thread on it (linked below), which is bigly recommended.

Read 55 tweets
6 Jan
<THREAD>

The book of Ruth unfolds against the backdrop of dark and dangerous times in Israel,

and shows how great things can come of plain, down-to-earth, unglamorous faithfulness.

It’s a story of great beauty,

but contains an unusual twist.

For details, scroll down.
Image from jw.org. (Theology obtained elsewhere.)
Chapters 3 and 4 make an unusual climax to the book of Ruth.

Why does the book conclude not with the jubilation of Naomi (4.14–17), but with a genealogy (4.18–22)?

And why does the text describe Ruth and Boaz’s night-time encounter in the way it does?
Read 46 tweets
2 Jan
THREAD: Some Reflections on the Text of 1 Kings 22.1–39.

TITLE: Why it’s not a good idea to surround yourself with 400 people who agree with you.

#DontBeAnAhab
« 22.1–4 »

As we pick up the story in ch. 22, things aren’t what we might expect.

Despite Ahab’s many evils, peace prevails between the northern kingdom (Israel) and her most immediate rival (Syria) (22.1 w. 20.34).
And, despite his idolatry, Ahab’s managed to establish closer than usual ties with Judah, courtesy of Jehoshaphat (22.2 w. 44),

who isn’t otherwise a bad king.
Read 58 tweets
28 Dec 20
THREAD: The Exploitation of Power in the Biblical Narrative.

SUB-TITLE: Sex, Lies, & Intertextuality,…

…subjects I’ve recently (and sadly) been reminded of.

Below is an anonymised version of a Bible story.

Please have a read of it. I suspect it’ll soon ring a bell.
It came to pass in the days of Israel’s kings, after an important battle between Israel and Syria, that a little-known Israelite came to acquire an important ‘possession’.

That possession was very dear to him. He valued and cherished it. In many respects, it was all he had.
By contrast, the king of Israel was a man of great wealth. (Oddly, however, at the outset of our story, we find him in bed in the middle of the day.)

He had a whole array of possessions like the possessions of the little-known Israelite.
Read 81 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!