“The tendency has been to accept narratives about logistics, costs, & risks. As a result, lawmakers, parents, and teachers aren’t sufficiently aware (or reminded) of the feasibility of reopening safely, without expensive measures or additional delays.”
EdWeek specializes in surveys. What about @educationweek surveys of the reopened districts to ask how much they are distancing, to tell us whether districts are running with 3-ft versus 4-ft?
Just one example of where journlists could illuminate solutions.
.@alexanderrusso wants a deeper dive into the big shifts at the CDC, DOE, etc. And more accountability journalism. I want those things, too. Badly.
But right now, I’d settle for efforts to aggregate the info superintendents need to reopen schools.
Both of my ideas above...
Are straightforward. Not audacious challenges here. Also, not new needs... the field has needed these things a while.
I co-sign all of @alexanderrusso’s thoughts in the OP. Endlessly hoping for a renewed approach to COVID-era coverage.
Anyone who wants to synthesize the ventilation info can start here:
You won’t find a better takedown of the closure thresholds and 6-foot distancing, together in a tight, handy read, than @VPrasadMDMPH@vkoganpolisci’s new piece.
Let us never forget that the lead author of the CDC’s Wisconsin study, @TracyBethHoeg, has critiques these same details, noting the high community spread in WI during tneis study, which established virtually no spread in schools.
I offered that both parents could chaperon a play date in a park, insisting on masks and distancing. (At the time, COVID rates were well below 1%, maybe .1%, in our area.) No luck.
I think a lot about this lovely girl & her lovely family. The fears they are experiencing. The effect on a 3rd grader of seeing no other kids for a year, BC they are that strict, I believe.
I have the highest hopes for the post-vaccine era. Yet my high hopes are often dashed.