1) In a bold move the UN is once again linking the climate crisis to the rest of the ecological crisis as it originally was at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. I've a bold request, please make the COP talks starting with COP 26 only consider solutions which address the whole crisis.
2) Originally, climate change was separated from the rest of the ecological crisis in the hope of rapidly getting a global agreement to start rapidly reducing CO2 emissions by the 1990s, much in the manner the Montreal Protocol had ended the production of CFCs.
3) With hindsight it was a massive mistake to separate the climate crisis from the much bigger ecological crisis, because dishonest politicians and vested interests have dishonestly pretended that climate change was the only crisis and as such have focused on techno-fixes.
4) By techno-fixes, I am not attacking technology, but the mindset that only focuses on technological solutions to reduce carbon emissions and atmospheric CO2, and does not even acknowledge mitigation and system change i.e. trying to find a way to have our cake and eat it.
5) It is this sole focus on the climate component, which has allowed billionaires like @BillGates to laughably present himself as a climate leader, despite not even mentioning the far bigger ecological crisis, and apparently having no solutions to it.
gmwatch.org/en/news/latest…
6) Since the COP talks CO2 emissions have massively risen, I believe by about 60% and half the emissions in the whole of human history have been produced during the period we were supposed to be reducing them with the COP talks.
7) The targets of the Paris Agreement are entirely reliant on future technology, which doesn't currently exist and might never exist at the necessary scale, to suck excess CO2 out of the atmosphere.
8) Yesterday I wrote a short essay on why our governments never even consider the option of simply restricting or ending the activities driving the climate and ecological crisis, but will only consider magic techno-fixes, that allow them to continue with business as usual.
9) My request here is that the UN and every concerned person bring pressure to bear so starting from COP 26, that only solutions and plans which address the whole ecological crisis, as detailed in Making Peace with Nature, are considered.
unep.org/news-and-stori…
10) We must nip in the bud the magical thinking of Net Zero carbon plans, that do not add up and only involve taking action in the distant future, and which ignore the rest of the ecological crisis. If the plan does not address the whole crisis, it should be seen as fraudulent.
11) For clarity I am suggesting that a holistic vision and plan like Making Peace with Nature, has to be at the centre of all future COP talks, if they are not just going to be a distraction, a red herring.
@threadreaderapp please unroll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

17 Feb
"US conservatives falsely blame renewables for Texas storm outages" - when the reality is that this blast of cold weather in the US is driven heating in the Arctic effecting the polar vortex (see tweets below). #ClimateCrisis
theguardian.com/us-news/2021/f…
Despite the mounting evidence of polar vortex disruption by global heating, causing unusual warming of the Arctic, driving unusual cold conditions in the southern US (see this article from 2019), it is not being mentioned much.
nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/1…
As the above article was from 2019 it was quite prophetic in forecasting the record breaking cold conditions causing chaos in the US at the moment (as was the article below, published before the current cold blast).
nationalgeographic.com/environment/20…
Read 5 tweets
7 Feb
1) There are many people nitpicking Greta's very fine tweet, generally taking issue with what they presume or present to be Greta's definition of both democracy, with the underlying tacit assumption being that Greta is naive about both, in definition and practise.
2) Firstly, and most importantly, Greta just made a single tweet, to make a very cutting observation about what is happening today in countries which previously described themselves as bastions of democracy. Greta was not writing a detailed academic essay.
3) Self-evidently, if you just make a single tweet, or say some in few words, you can't go in the definitions of the terms you have used, the concepts, the caveats etc. Therefore, making up your own definition and arguing against is the straw man logical fallacy.
Read 19 tweets
3 Feb
1) On 24 February 2020 last year, I not only accurately predicted the COVID-19 global pandemic, but the wider impacts on our economy and system of governance. The way governments would be hamstrung by their need to maintain economic growth. See link below.
theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/f…
2) Here it is, please read the tweets below the first.
3) There are many countries that only experienced a relative handful of deaths from COVID-19, or even none at all in January 2021. The only reason the UK received the highest death rates in the world in January is because it needlessly ended lockdown before Christmas.
Read 30 tweets
31 Jan
1) This is fair question and I want to answer how I think we can address the climate and ecological emergency and create a sustainable society. This is a summary of 50 years of deep thinking about how to achieve it. @GeorgeMonbiot @GretaThunberg @ClimateHuman @GreenRupertRead
2) I believe the greatest single obstacle is the culture wide misconception that to achieve this we need to create a great big plan, or even a rough outline. This seems so obvious to most people, but I can't think of a single successful historical precedent for this.
3) Historical precedent demonstrates that all such grand preconceived plans fail, or at least have to be seriously modified or entirely changed. Historical precedent demonstrates that only total commitment to addressing the crisis succeeds, and the solutions emerge from this.
Read 20 tweets
28 Jan
1) It is vital that all those committed to addressing the climate and ecological crisis, understand the dynamic I've described in the 3 tweet thread I've linked to below. @GeorgeMonbiot @Fridays4future @ClimateHuman
2) For 30 years, in fact longer, we've been trapped in an unproductive cycle of our leadership promising to address the climate and ecological crisis, and then doing nothing except making a few token gestures.
3) This is very dangerous because we've lost lots of valuable time we no longer have. 25-30 years ago it would have been possible to transition to a sustainable society in an incremental way. But this is no longer possible and only radical action now will work.
Read 25 tweets
22 Jan
1) This illustrates the whole climate and ecological emergency in a nutshell. The world is heading towards a climate catastrophe, but the most obvious ways to reduce our carbon emissions are being ignored, because billionaires can't profit from the solutions.
2) The most effective ways to reduce carbon emissions are to restore the Earth's peat bogs, rewild the land, restore natural forests, eat drastically less meat, and stop extracting and burning fossil fuels. It really is that simple.
nature.com/articles/d4158…
3) These are quite simple to achieve, we could start straight away, none require magic technology, and have been known about as effective solutions for decades. So why don't we pursue these simple natural solutions? @GretaThunberg @GeorgeMonbiot
naturalclimate.solutions
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!