Why would anyone listen to an institute established by a politician who deceived Britain into an illegal and deeply immoral war? Blair is an *extremely dangerous* political actor:-
4) In this document we see Blair advisor Powell discussing 'good cop - bad cop' routine and threats to attack Syria and Iran, countries completely unconnected with 9/11
5) And in this document dates 11 October [4 weeks after 9/11], Blair discusses advises the US president on plans to pursue regime-change ops including against Iraq noting 'We just don't need to debate it too freely in public ...'
9) A conservative and now dated estimate of the deaths flowing from the wars Blair deceived about is over one million (up until 2009). Numbers now are undoubtedly many times higher :ippnw.de/commonFiles/pd…… ... and still the MSM and political establishment enable Blair.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission @marydejevsky@freddiesayers
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…… @RobertF40396660
@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission. @BloomsburyPub@Tim_Hayward_
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…… @RobertF40396660
@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission. @BloomsburyPub@Tim_Hayward_
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@RobertF40396660
@SJobDigital Would the British government like to investigate why a senior OPCW official stated the following regarding the @opcw Syria fact finding missions?
2) And can you explain why this toxicology report from NATO chemical weapons experts was redacted from the final OPCW report on Douma:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…