@SJobDigital Would the British government like to investigate why a senior OPCW official stated the following regarding the @opcw Syria fact finding missions?
2) And can you explain why this toxicology report from NATO chemical weapons experts was redacted from the final OPCW report on Douma:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
3) This toxicology report states clearly that the victims were not killed by chlorine gas at location 2
4) and, as reported by the @couragefound panel, can the UK government explain why key chemistry, ballistics and witness testimony evidence was omitted or distorted in the final Douma report:- couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
5) And can the FCO explain why the UK government blocked the OPCW's first Director General from talking about this issue at the UNSC? What is the British government scared of?
7) So, before you engage in UK government propaganda activities, perhaps you might address these issues in a factual and honest manner. Is that something you could manage? @2ndNewMoon@Tim_Hayward_@VanessaBeeley
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission. @BloomsburyPub@Tim_Hayward_
1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:
2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@RobertF40396660
Here is the end result of the campaign of bullying, threats and intimidation that has become part of the COVID-19 propaganda campaign. Genuine scientists intimidated and exhausted. @MartinKulldorff@SunetraGupta
1) The fact that authorities have been engaging in propaganda aimed at elevating levels of fear is now well established. rt.com/op-ed/490110-c…
2) Whilst leading media figures such as @piersmorgan have played a key role in terms of creating a culture of fear through blatant bullying and intimidation over social media @ClarkeMicah
The US, UK and French governments have repeatedly sort to prevent objective and rigorous @opcw investigations of the alleged chemical attacks in Syria @MaryLouMcDonald@RonanLTynan.
1) At the @couragefound attended by Jose Bustani, the 1st DG of the #OPCW, an OPCW official reported procedural and scientific flaws with respect to the alleged Douma chemical weapon attack. couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
2) Since then a significant volume of leaked documents have corroborated the issues raised at the @couragefoundation panel wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/#OP…
@jessbrammar How do you reconcile your relentless smear campaign against academics researching alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria with the following facts?:- @ruskin147@Tim_Hayward_
1) It appears from this that the late James Le Mesurier was in communication with Kamm. Did he make contact out of the blue, or did someone else put him in touch with @oliverkamm?
1) You also claim that 'reading the OPCW report, it's clear that the inspectors took the idea that the attack might have been faked very seriously. They discussed it as a scenario and tested their evidence against that possibility." Can you evidence this?
2) This is imp. because it was actually the original unpublished interim report and the toxicology minutes from the meeting with NATO chemical weapons experts that specified alternative hypotheses, whereas the published reports did not. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…