NEW from @Claire_Bushey & me:

In cities/metros across the US, the areas most affected by the pandemic are often the slowest to be vaccinated, reflecting long-standing patterns of segregation

We spent weeks gathering the data from 5 of them

Story:
ft.com/content/7b0db8…
Our story begins in Chicago, one of the most segregated cities in the US.

HT @ChiVaxBot and @WF_Parker who have been regularly tracking these disparities & whose work partly inspired us to do our own digging into other localities

Maps of Chicago, Illinois, ...
Variations on this same theme of "Who is vaccinated?" vs" Who is dying?" (this is an actual meme) are playing out in other cities & surrounding areas.

In Washington, DC: Maps of Washington, DC Covi...
In New York City: Maps of New York City Covid...
In Baltimore, Maryland: Maps of Baltimore city, Mar...
In King County, Washington: (map shows Seattle and surrounding areas) Zip code maps of Covid-19 c...
Here's the same data in Baltimore & Chicago plotted a different way: income is highly correlated with first dose vaccination rate, weeks into the expansion of eligibility past Phase 1a ... Scatterplots of first dose ...
And yet another way of visualizing the racial disparities in vaccinations, inspired by @KFF's state-by-state report kff.org/policy-watch/e…

(Note all records have race/ethnicity. Only Black vs white shown bc the quality of data across cities was less good/comparable for others) Bar charts showing in citie...
Why the disparities? Main factors are access, eligibility & hesitancy.

ACCESS/ELIGIBILITY:

> In the US, vaccine rollout is what @helenegayle called a "patchwork quilt" — the CDC makes recommendations but final plans are left to states & localities

kff.org/other/state-in…
ACCESS/ELIGIBILITY (cont'd):

> First-come, first-served online systems can also exacerbate inequalities, groups like @IMPACT4HC say ... it's "like trying to get concert tickets" Image
ACCESS/ELIGIBILITY (cont'd):

> Outreach is extremely important, as @alikhan28 @OakStreetHealth notes.

HESITANCY is another factor, thought impt to note that vaccine enthusiasm has increased across racial groups

kff.org/report-section… Via Kaiser Family Foundatio...
Part of this is rooted in a long history of medical malpractices, often by the US government (Tuskegee, Marion Sims, Henrietta Lacks are among most high-profile cases)

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
However, David Hodge @TuskegeeUniv says focusing too much on the past diminishes the salience of more immediate disparities in health treatments among communities of color: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25032386/

"The present factors are just as vicious" in creating distrust—"perhaps more so"
What are some solutions? @helenegayle and others are calling for geographical prioritization of hardest-hit areas or areas w/ high SVI atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth…

> Interestingly, in Chicago's 15 target neighborhoods, ALL who live in these areas are eligible wbez.org/stories/chicag… Image
Other recommendations include:
> overlapping phases
> a lottery system within phases
> more outreach/transparent communication
> geographic allocation of vaccine supply proportional to need

healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hbl… @WF_Parker @GovindPersad @DrMonicaPeek
More on that last point, @WF_Parker puts it this way: if a zip code on the South Side of Chicago has 5x the death rate than one on the north side he says it shld have 5x the vaccine supply

"Basically, we need to pour the water where the fire is burning"

ft.com/content/7b0db8…
Finally, these inequalities are not unique to the US. @jburnmurdoch notes disparities in the UK vaccine rollout, according to data analysis by @bengoldacre & team

HT @jburnmurdoch for encouraging me to look into this by pointing out how much more data there is in the US given its size — which is true, although the quality/consistency of said data & how to present it is best summed up by:
🙃🙃🙃 and will be the subject of my next thread😅

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christine Zhang

Christine Zhang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @christinezhang

16 Nov 20
NEW: #Election2020 turnout is the highest in over a century, but who's gotten the most votes, and where? We looked at precinct & county data in key areas to find out: [THREAD]

By @jburnmurdoch & me — our second @FT collab in two weeks! ⚡️

ft.com/content/31a027…
1/ Much of the story's in the suburbs, which Biden "won back" to a certain extent. Meanwhile, a red rural wave has countered the suburban swing.

Result: an increasingly polarized US.
2/ More detail here: taking battlegrounds MI, PA, WI & GA as a whole, there's a clear & pronounced net vote increase in the suburbs for Biden in 2020 vs Clinton 2016
Read 23 tweets
7 Nov 20
HOW DID AMERICANS VOTE/SHIFT FROM 2016? It's tempting to just compare 2020 exit polls to 16's to unpack voting patterns, but that's problematic.

Our @FT story explains why & uses exits AND other sources to paint a preliminary picture of trends: (THREAD)

ft.com/content/69f320…
0/ TLDR: Here's our summary #dataviz that shows the shifts, because my time in journalism has taught me not to bury the lede 🤓

But hey, it's my twitter thread so I'm gonna answer the "How did you get these numbers?" Qs that @jburnmurdoch & I grappled with *A LOT*
1/ In order to (responsibly) make statements like "___ voters moved away from Biden" and "___ voters shifted toward Trump" since '16 where ___ is a demographic, you need to know:

(a) How this demographic voted in '16
(b) How this demographic voted in '20

Simple, right? No.
Read 25 tweets
4 Sep 20
POLLS EXPLAINER: it's natural to want to compare 2020 election polls to 2016's, especially in swing states, but here's why that might not be such a good idea. My story in the @FT today reviews the key differences: (THREAD)

ft.com/content/b32976…
1/ there's a lot of talk abt Trump/Biden betting odds being at 50:50, but here's a chart via @martinstabe showing in 2016, betting mkts were confident Clinton would win. in surveys more ppl including Trump voters also said they thought Clinton would win ft.com/content/3c9487…
2/ this yr it's the opposite perception; more ppl/mkts think Trump will win. despite Biden's robust national polling lead, compared to Clinton's. now let's address the "the polls were wrong" critique. it's an understandable reaction to 2016, but *national* polls did pretty well!
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!