See this thread for a perfect description of one of the defining attributes of the prevailing climate of left-liberal spaces: how inviting! Who wouldn’t want to be part of this?
You see it most vividly now in how opposition to ***Neera Tanden*** is being cast as sexism & racism:
No possible reason other than sexism or racism why one might find Neera Tanden reprehensible.
I also love how Neera’s most devoted defenders are (1) the most bloodthirsty, deceitful GOP-neocons of the War on Terror era and (2) someone who, like her, took millions of from the United Arab Emirates.
Shows not only what Neera is but, more importantly, the Democratic Party:
It was perfectly fine to smear @TulsiGabbard with every foul slander that entered the mind: Russian agent, alt-right, secret Trump supporter. Neera often led the way. That was totally OK.
But now - from those who did it - opposing Neera makes you a racist and sexist. So cynical.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reason I was about to obtain and publish Neera Tanden's internal emails at CAP -- including the now-infamous "Libya's oil" one -- is because she was so abusive to her employees for so long that they were willing to take career risks to come forward:
The claim that opposition to her is just about "mean tweets" is blatantly preposterous. She has long been one of the most slanderous, vicious and deceitful partisan operatives in DC. She censored her own writers when funders demanded it. She's toxic, unhinged, and incompetent.
Hard to believe the Biden WH is really still trying to salvage her nomination instead of pretending to. Look at this idiotic messaging. To whom does this language appeal besides hardened Dem partisans? It addresses none of the valid concerns about Neera:
For the third time in less than five months, Congress has summoned tech CEOs, with the explicit intent to coerce them to censor more content.
In their zeal to control online speech, House Dems are getting closer to the constitutional line, if they have not already crossed it.
In 2018, the ACLU defended the NRA when it sued Cuomo and NY State for something similar: implicitly threatening businesses with punishment if they kept doing business with the group.
This is what ACLU's @benwizner told me about these latest efforts with Dems & Silicon Valley:
The stunning and complete reversal of the OAS-engineered coup in Bolivia at the end of 2019, and the full-scale reinstatement of Bolivian sovereignty by the democratically elected successor to Evo Morales, is a story of great consequence and inspiration.
The OAS is currently trying the same coup in Ecuador. They want to ensure a clone of Lenin Moreno -- the neoliberal puppet who they bullied into turning over Assange -- wins, even though the ally of Correa, who protected Assange, has far more support.
I know it's not obvious why the election in Ecuador matters but it does. The US, using its OAS facade, is eager to install a neoliberal masquerading as a leftist to do its bidding, preventing the popular leader from winning.
*This* is called "interfering in other countries."
One of Bolsonaro's most loyal supporters in Congress, ex-military police officer @danielPMERJ, was arrested last night on orders of the Supreme Court after he posted a video threatening Court justices & praising dictatorship-era repression. Big free speech & due process debate.
It seems quite clear watching the video that he knew the Supreme Court might arrest him and basically dared them to. They did. This is the most extreme Bolsonarista wing. They explicitly crave a final clash with the Court & Congress to re-instate military dictatorship measures.
The pro-Bolsonaro Congressman arrested Tuesday on orders of a Supreme Court justice for a YouTube video threatening the court and advocating dictatorship-era repression had his arrest upheld yesterday -- unanimously -- by the full Court 11-0. See above.
Insisting on factual accuracy does not make one an apologist for the protesters. False reporting is never justified, especially to inflate threat and fear levels.
The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are.
After these two NYT articles, this horrifying story about a pro-Trump mob beating a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher was repeated over and over, by journalists on television, in print, and on social media.
The problem with this story: it is false in all respects.
Somehow, it turns out that @ProjectLincoln was even scummier, most dishonest, and more of a fraudulent scam than those of us most loudly warning about it for two years could possibly have imagined.
How is it possible that so many #Resistance liberals were persuaded to transfer their cash in the middle of a pandemic to a group of life-long GOP operatives who were known to everyone in politics and media as relentlessly sleazy and dishonest? @tooningout provided a hint:
In case there's anyone buying the utter bullshit that people didn't realize until the last few weeks that the Lincoln Project was one of the sleaziest and most dishonest scams, look at what @tooningout did to @TheRickWilson when they interviewed him last June.