The acidaemia in CKD (may) cause:
➡️ Bone demineralisation
➡️ Faster CKD progression
➡️ Protein & muscle catabolism
➡️ Hyperkalaemic tendency
These flow diagrams always make cause & effect appear certain - in reality there is a fair bit more uncertainty (from Dobre 2020 NDT)
The decreased pH in CKD can be improved by:
✅ Stopping smoking
✅ Increasing intake of base-producing foods
✅ Giving furosemide
However, when these measures become insufficient then we consider ‘topping up’ with oral bicarbonate to help prevent the complications above.
So how do we give bicarb tablets?
In UK often use 500mg sodium bicarbonate tablets, starting at
3/day & then titrating.
(Note each tablet has 6mmol of HCO3. Compare this to the 150mmol of HCO3 in 1L of IV 1.26% sodium bicarb - hence why tablets don’t do much in acute setting!)
Problems:
❌ Tablet burden
❌ Abdominal cramps, burping
❌ Mixed evidence for efficacy (as with lots of things in renal…)
❌ No one knows exactly what level of serum bicarb to start treatment or what level to target….. as ever keen to hear the opinions of wider #nephtwitter!
Bonus tweet! When do we give IV bicarb in renal?
Consider 1.26% IV bicarb if meets checklist👇
✅ AKI is causing ⬇️pH (not ⬆️lactate etc.)
✅ Hyperkalaemic (not monotherapy, as adjunct)
✅ Fluid status = room for volume
✅ Patient can ⬆️RR (to blow off CO2 formed)
✅ Calcium OK
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Currently too often patients with high creatinine are given too much IV fluid, driven by an AKI ➡️ fluid reflex
We’ve seen 7 litres be given in one shift.
Medics & surgeons, juniors & seniors, it seems everyone loves to reach for extra IV fluid (especially if urine output poor)
Why does huge volume IV fluid ‘resuscitation’ consistently occur?
Lots of reasons, including FALSE beliefs:
🛑 IV fluid always “treats AKI”
🛑 Hypotension = hypovolaemia
🛑 Lactate >2 means fluid deficiency
🛑 Septic patients are very hypovolaemic