A couple posts downthread someone asks, apparently with 100% sincerity, "Have you ever thought NK might be a test run for NWO?" (i.e. the "New World Order" of vintage 1990s conspiracy theories.)
But I shouldn't exaggerate the level of resistance to Q's ideas. /pol/ is a VERY conspiracy-friendly space; the average anon is closer to this post than to the skeptics' takes:
"Can I have a quick rundown please ? What'll happens ? NESARA ? The Swamp ?"
Q is about to make an appearance in this thread, which will be my signal to stop summarizing it. So I'll leave you with this round-up written by an anon. It is, once again, very interesting -- it puts Q on even footing with another LARPer...
and the post may also have Q confused with White House Insider (yet another LARPer -- WHI was a fairly prominent & successful one, though, easily in the top tier of /pol/ LARPs).
We tend to think of Q as this sort of... inevitable force of nature, but of course that's not right.
In fact, Q was part of an ENORMOUS ecosystem of LARPers, all vying for attention and pressing a bunch of conflicting storylines.
The post below is very valuable, not so much because you should understand the people and events it's talking about --fuck THAT, you don't need to--
as because it illustrates *how many LARPs there were, and how they were fighting for attention at all times.*
This post mentions, by my count, 11 different LARPers -- and it doesn't even mention Q *or* "OPAnon" from earlier CBTS threads.
And that's just part 1. Part 2 of that post adds three more LARPers, including our old friend Highway Patrolman, and identifies a "MilInt Anon (breadcrumbs)" in a spinoff from HWP's thread -- this is a reference to the lost drops I found from 10/30/17.
So in ADDITION to my earlier statements re: LARPers being locked in an endless battle for attention -- which are true & I stand by 'em -- I should add:
Some anons paid VERY close attention to ongoing LARPs; for them, it was almost a spectator sport. I wonder if Q was one of 'em.
P.S. I am VERY dissatisfied with this thread -- it's sorta... quick, disorganized thoughts that occurred to me during a first read-through. If you read it and were like "Wait, I don't understand X," just drop your questions here. :)
I'll answer ASAP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember how South Dakota's attorney general killed a man in a hit-and-run? Reporter @Ajzionts has interrogation tapes. WILD to see the mix of kid-gloves treatment & standard interrogation tactics here.
P.S. Read *past* the part where it says he was reading conspiracy-theory BS.
Would highly recommend you read that whole thread, but at the VERY LEAST get down to post 34. (Yes, you may scoff and go "WHO HAS TIME?", but... read at least that far. Just trust me on this.)
OH, THIS IS SOME BULLSHIT.
He was charged with *three misdemeanors????*
THE VICTIM'S FACE WAS THRU HIS GODDAMNED WINDSHIELD. HE WAS ON THE PHONE READING SOME KIND OF BIDEN-CHINA CONSPIRACY THEORY WHEN HE HIT THE VICTIM, WHO WAS ON THE SHOULDER, NOT THE ROAD ITSELF.
So! Speaking of Christians who love shofars *and* QAnon...
@JosiahBisbee slid into my DMs (which I encourage ALL experts to do when their knowledge is even QUASI-relevant!) and patiently explained -- using very small words -- *why* QAnon appeals so strongly to "Messianic Jews":
This strain of Christianity (and some strains of charismatic Xtianity that also emphasize Jewish practices, I gather) "attracts people really trying to understand the New Testament in light of its first century Jewish context." Why does that make it mesh so well with QAnon? Well:
QAnon is, of course, an *apocalyptic* religion. And so was early Christianity.
In fact, many "Messianic Jews" (and other, I guess you'd call them, Judaism-focused charismatic Christians) pursue that form of faith because they are, per Bisbee, "attracted to 'end times' ideas."
Last December, I wrote "'THIS revolution would NEVER devour its children!' A thread for Republican elected officials."
To prove my point -- that the base *really does want to kill* elected Republicans for not being Trumpy enough -- I attached lots of rhetoric JUST like MTG's.
Oh, maybe it was a BIT more violent. This one was a much more direct threat, for example.
EVERYONE asks this when they encounter Q-related content.
The thing is, it's not really a question of *intellectual belief*. It's about group dynamics -- if the price of *unbelief* is being booted out of a group that gives your life meaning, you'll do what it takes to stay in.
This is a REALLY interesting example of how 4chan users thought about Q right when Q was on the *cusp* of superstardom: Q wasn't THAT well-known, and Q's content was "authenticated" by listening to what OTHER anons said -- and to Alex Jones' radio show.
Neat historical side note: right below that post, anons start discussing sedition.
"I don't really know what that is," says one.
"Inciting insurrection against lawful authority," says another.
And the concept was never relevant again 🙃
Anyway, a further note on the Alex Jones stuff (hi, @Punkerockeriam) -- one anon claims that the information on Alex Jones' show was being cited as validating Q came, in fact, from *the author of this self-same thread about Q.*
This is a very good question! Japan doesn't have THAT many more people than, say, the Philippines (to pick a country purely at random that definitely has never featured in any sort of QAnon-related speculation whatsoever). 😈
And yet Japan has exported the hell out of its culture, whereas Filipino culture, I would say, *has* been exported, but almost exclusively by way of the diaspora.
I mean, I'm not an expert on this, so I welcome corrections if I'm wrong... but assuming I'm right (or right-ish):