This is a very good question! Japan doesn't have THAT many more people than, say, the Philippines (to pick a country purely at random that definitely has never featured in any sort of QAnon-related speculation whatsoever). 😈
And yet Japan has exported the hell out of its culture, whereas Filipino culture, I would say, *has* been exported, but almost exclusively by way of the diaspora.
I mean, I'm not an expert on this, so I welcome corrections if I'm wrong... but assuming I'm right (or right-ish):
why *is* this?
Alt's explanation, which I shouldn't spoil bc you'll want to buy the book, is multifaceted -- and it'd HAVE to be, to get it right!
Some parts read like an economic history, sketching out the sort of... structural forces that led to, e.g., the growth of manga.
And it's not that Alt doesn't *cover* the personalities or companies or milestones that made manga possible -- he does. It's just that none of those would have happened without, for example, the huge population of young, male surplus laborers who *consumed* much of the product...
and whose tastes, at least as much as the creative impulses of artists themselves, drove the art form in different directions.
Alt's discussion of *material* culture is also very strong -- reading through the book one gets a sense of a densely populated, thoroughly urbanized...
society, which of course Japan *is* -- it's famous for it -- but it wasn't inevitable that this would *come across* in a book that could easily have just sort of been a series of disjointed chapters about, say, Japan's production of toy cars in the postwar years, and...
the invention of karaoke machines (not popular with lounge singers, by the way, which is ironic bc it was invented BY a lounge singer), and the advantages that helped Japan dominate the consumer electronics sector, etc.
With SO MANY disparate threads to stitch together...
it would be natural for the seams to show throughout the book. But they hardly do at all; instead it *feels* like a cohesive whole, and only when you stop to talk about what you just learned do you realize: wait a second, whoa, this was a MASTERCLASS in synthesizing information.
Anyway, buy @Matt_Alt's book "Pure Invention: How Japan's Pop Culture Conquered the World."
Or get it at the library.
'cause if you read it you'll learn a bunch of true things, almost all of which are new to you, & isn't that what life is for?
“I am looking for credible sources, besides actual books” — the song of the 4chan anon.
BTW, here Highway Patrolman tries to steer the LARP towards Las Vegas, Nevada — site of a recent mass shooting that the anons were FEVERISHLY speculating about.
But this post is really notable because of what it’s wedged in between:
In the posts right before, and immediately after, the attempted Las Vegas derail, an anon fulminates about how “untouchable” the Rothschilds are (hi, Marjorie!), and how SOMEHOW people think it’s ANTISEMITIC to say that JEWS CONTROL THE BANKS; HWP Anon responds:
UPDATE: Patrick Byrne is EXTREMELY horny for his One True President, but, like
in a manly, straight, entrepreneurial way
also there’s a long segment where he whines about how hard it is to be a CEO, which I will spare you, for I am a benevolent overlord
It took a long-ass time for SLIGHTLY less fascist people to arrive in the room with these unscheduled intruders, whereupon Byrne accused them of being INSUFFICIENTLY fascist and Trump got big mad...
So... lemme see if I can lay this out briefly, with the understanding that it's not complete and also I suck at being brief. 😃
@eriksmithcomedy@julianfeeld@nickbackovic What I am looking for -- and I suspect what everyone else is looking for, but IDK if they'd describe it in both terms -- is evidence that is highly relevant *and* highly reliable.
I don't really have a formal procedure where I, like, GRADE pieces of evidence on both points.
@eriksmithcomedy@julianfeeld@nickbackovic But if I did, the evidence that would score highest is always going to be the canonical Q drops: they are 100% relevant to the QAnon movement and they are... not 100% reliable (in that they're missing, so far, 11 lost drops and also the information in them ISN'T TRUE, duh).
Things are going great for Sidney Powell, who -- on her Telegram -- just linked to a long blog post supposedly by Patrick Byrne (the Overstock guy).
The post said Sidney was great and Rudy was, essentially, a senile alcoholic.
But check out this incredible gem from it:
Byrne, by the way, is either a chan-CHUD or a Q follower.
Note his use of "weaponized autism" here.
Naturally in Byrne's universe, HE is the real hero here and the ragtag team of misfits he assembled to Definitely Prove A Big Fraud (and which he apparently turned over to Flynn at some point) were-- well, look!
I remember when I warned that GOP legislatures in swing states would try to pass laws like this, and people went "the voters would NEVER stand for it, they wouldn't dare."
Worth noting the bill isn't introduced by some low-profile backbencher, but by the chair of the Ways and Means Committee.
But wait, somehow there's even more: this bill would REQUIRE that ALL election challenges, no matter how meritless or *legally inadequate* they are, proceed to trial -- and that a jury trial be an option, AND that a judge can't throw the case out until the trial is complete.