It's exhausting debating lockdown sceptics who point to economic damage to prematurely cut restrictions.
We have one of the world's worst death tolls AND recessions because we repeatedly locked down too late.
The virus is the threat to the economy. How has this not been learnt!
When people say "It's easy to support lockdown measures when it's not your business or job you're worried about."
But not locking down quickly means infections spiral out of control, so you have to impose longer, harsher restrictions which cause more damage to businesses or jobs
It's ridiculous that I still find myself debating this on TV after nearly a year of this total nightmare. How is it not completely obvious that not suppressing the virus leads to a worse economic shock in the medium and long term?
The solution all along should have been "lock down quickly, sort out test and trace, give proper support to people and businesses throughout the crisis."
Instead we ended up with one of the worst death tolls and economic hits on earth.
And they're going to get away with it!
Please feel my pain
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the most important themes in 'It's A Sin' was about gay/bi people and shame - caused by growing up in a society that saw gay/bi people as would-be sexual predators, violators of biological reality, threats to children, immoral, deviants, and generally undesirable.
That sense of shame afflicts lots of gay/bi people to varying degrees, and fuels higher levels of mental distress and, as a consequence, significantly higher risk of abusive relationships with drugs and alcohol.
While HIV rates remain significantly higher among gay and bisexual men, treatments now allow those with HIV to live healthy lives.
Alcohol and drug abuse as a response to shame and trauma caused by homophobia is today a bigger problem in Western nations. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
One of the reasons Britain has one of the worst death tolls on earth is that senior journalists not only actively defended our government's catastrophic strategy in March 2020 - they actively ridiculed anyone who challenged it.
The government only got away with its catastrophic handling of the pandemic because so much of our media is servile to power, and will swallow anything the government feeds it.
Genuinely painful to read.
COVID-19 is the most lethal example of what happens when you live in a country where so much of the media acts as the propaganda arm of the Conservative Party.
Here's a thread about how completely impossible it is to have a rational conversation about Brexit.
In the 2016 referendum, I campaigned for Remain. Here's a speech I gave 3 and a half weeks before the referendum. A clip of it appeared in TV drama 'Brexit: The Uncivil War'.
I'm now told that actually I'm not a Remainer, despite campaigning for Remain in the referendum campaign in rallies in, say, Wolverhampton, London and Greater Manchester, arguing for Remain on Question Time, and writing multiple columns supporting Remain.
Here's a viral video I made before the referendum result, warning about the consequences of Tory Brexit.
Diane Abbott was wrong to share an online platform with apologists for China's atrocities against Muslim Uighurs. But this saga again underlines the grotesque double standards applied to a) the left and b) a Black woman.
Tony Blair is a former Prime Minister - obviously far more influential than Diane Abbott - and is guilty of two things:
1) Direct apologism for Chinese atrocities in Xinjiang province
2) A relationship with China's regime
In 2014, in an interview with a mouthpiece of China's regime, Blair made common cause between the West and China's "counter-terrorism" drive in Xinjiang, and denounced "double standards" applied to China which "is facing the same problem as we are facing." globaltimes.cn/content/866551…
Private education is just one way the privileged are given their advantages. It starts from birth. Affluent parents have babies with higher birth weights. They have less cramped houses, meaning better well-being and more quiet places to study.
Better-off parents tend to have more formal education and more "cultural capital". A big gap in vocabulary between richer and poorer children opens up when they're very young. Their parents can afford private tutoring. Diets are better and their children never go hungry
Poverty can impose specific stresses on family life that the affluent tend not to have. Poorer children are more likely to suffer from mental distress and poorer physical health, all of which impact educational attainment.