Someone showed me some "Anarchist Ugyhur Genocide Debunk Debunk" video.
I don't want anything to do with these people.
Anarchism is an ideology that says its members should *not* be holding each other accountable, and it results in this.
Down with "lefty unity."
I don't want anything to do with these people.
Anarchism is an ideology that says its members should *not* be holding each other accountable, and it results in this.
Down with "lefty unity."
me: Up to my neck in research explaining every major action by the USSR, China, Cuba, the BPP, etc.
them: Proudhon and Bakunin's antisemitism irrelevant, Bey's pedophilia irrelevant, CHAZ murders irrelevant. Anarchism cannot be held accountable for any one anarchist's actions.
them: Proudhon and Bakunin's antisemitism irrelevant, Bey's pedophilia irrelevant, CHAZ murders irrelevant. Anarchism cannot be held accountable for any one anarchist's actions.
These people dismiss @moghilemear13's absolutely brilliant research work as "just a medium blog" only to turn around and shovel Adrian Zenz's medium blog in their source list.
And for all the "No Gods No Masters" preaching, they sure do have a lot of respect for AP and the NYT!
And for all the "No Gods No Masters" preaching, they sure do have a lot of respect for AP and the NYT!
In fact, the most telling thing about these "NOT TRUSTWORTHY" disclaimers is which sources they *didn't* affix it to.
"Of course I don't trust Financial Times, silly, I'm an anarchist! *snort* I trust the BBC and the NYT!"
"Of course I don't trust Financial Times, silly, I'm an anarchist! *snort* I trust the BBC and the NYT!"
Here's shares from local anarchist pages so please stop arguing that this chauvinsm is some kind of "Twitter only" thing.
>Asians are also being attacked because of the Chinese government's actions.
>Asians are also being attacked because of the Chinese government's actions.
Anarchists are never responsible for anyone else's actions.
Communists, meanwhile, are always responsible for each other's actions.
China officially apologizes and makes amends for racist incident, while Obama refuses to apologize for nuking Japan? To them, these are the same.
Communists, meanwhile, are always responsible for each other's actions.
China officially apologizes and makes amends for racist incident, while Obama refuses to apologize for nuking Japan? To them, these are the same.
Either ideas are worth discussing or they aren't.
If they aren't, why are you here?
If they are (and I think they are), then why run away from supposedly-minor conflicts with anarchism?
Without a decisive response to anarchism, what kind of response can there be to liberalism?
If they aren't, why are you here?
If they are (and I think they are), then why run away from supposedly-minor conflicts with anarchism?
Without a decisive response to anarchism, what kind of response can there be to liberalism?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
