I've heard people endlessly complain about cebrity culture, the worthlesness of being on social media, etc.

Along comes one bluecheck with some decent positions and everyone's like "he's the biggest asset we've ever had, you don't understand His plan."
The demands seem to be:

1) be grateful that a famous person echoed some of your work
2) be content with any partial understanding
3) be tolerant of repeated trashing of book clubs (which is how the research got done in the first place)

I disagree on all counts, of course.
I've always been diplomatic when disagreeing with Q/Andray, and this is how he lashed out last time I called out his unprompted mocking of book clubs.

Didn't see anyone demand he calm down or anything.

Why the double standard?
Is this drama? Am I annoyed? Yes, of course.

I'm gonna let it go, naturally, but I wanted to be clear on *why* it bothers me.

When I start hearing communists sound like Jordan Peterson fans ("you don't understand!", "out of context!"), it seems like celebrity culture to me.
If you want more info on where I'm coming from:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roderic Day

Roderic Day Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RodericDay

23 Feb
Mildly interesting China Watcher find, revealing how they pad their work with fake personas.

One of the first bits of Uyghur atrocity propaganda I ever encountered was @chuangcn's infamous "Spirit Breaking" long essay.

It's a terrible piece of writing.
One thing that I always found weird is that there was simply no trace of its author, "Adam Hunerven", anywhere online.

He seemed to exist *only* for that piece.

And it's one of the favourites of the anarcho-decolonial-ecosocialist crowd, because of its wounded language. ImageImage
Looking over my notes from a past thread, though, I noticed something.

"Spirit Breaking" is also the title of Darren Byler's thesis.
digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/… ImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
22 Feb
Someone showed me some "Anarchist Ugyhur Genocide Debunk Debunk" video.

I don't want anything to do with these people.

Anarchism is an ideology that says its members should *not* be holding each other accountable, and it results in this.

Down with "lefty unity."
me: Up to my neck in research explaining every major action by the USSR, China, Cuba, the BPP, etc.

them: Proudhon and Bakunin's antisemitism irrelevant, Bey's pedophilia irrelevant, CHAZ murders irrelevant. Anarchism cannot be held accountable for any one anarchist's actions.
These people dismiss @moghilemear13's absolutely brilliant research work as "just a medium blog" only to turn around and shovel Adrian Zenz's medium blog in their source list.

And for all the "No Gods No Masters" preaching, they sure do have a lot of respect for AP and the NYT!
Read 7 tweets
21 Feb
A lot of this Marxism vs. Religion discussion seems to be approached by people trying to show off how inclusive and open-minded they are, rather than breaking down the problem into constituent elements and explaining how to tackle them.
The problem with unchecked religious organizing is real and concrete.

The case of coup-era Bolivia is a very clear example of radicalized cops on the streets chanting prayers, before they charge in to slaughter indigenous people.
ETIM in China is another example of the US funding religious radicalism as a geopolitical weapon. In this case, Wahhabism within Islam.
Read 20 tweets
20 Feb
"Tankie vs anarchist discourse" is another name for the question of anti-imperialism.

Maybe you won't have to deal with it in local work, but the problem still exists. In the past, it affected Muslims, now it targets Asian people.

"Both sides are bad" solves nothing.
Innumerable people have written excellently on the problem of theory over practice.

Good writing on the problem of practice without theory is less common.

Assata Shakur definitely had some good lines on it, though: Image
Hồ Chí Minh also wrote about this subject.

There was a time when discussions about "2nd vs. 3rd international" were nonsense to him.

However, rather than embrace a dismissive anti-intellectual arrogance, he studied.

Is what he achieved in question?
redsails.org/the-path-which… Image
Read 6 tweets
19 Feb
Tsk tsk, seeing some Canadians out there not buying into the Canadian propaganda blitz that baselessly projects our own crimes and atrocities onto China to feel better about ourselves.

👏 Do 👏 better!
Canada's Communists vs. Canada's Radlibs in a nutshell:
What gets me about these flatworms is that they're always going on about the "undeniable evidence" and never, ever citing it.

Meanwhile I'm here trying to see if I can cram a QRT, 4 screenshots, and a text-quote into a single tweet to support my claims.
Read 7 tweets
17 Feb
If you don't call out Saddam Hussein for his WMDs and Incubators you 👏 don't 👏 truly 👏 care!
Caring is repeating White Supremacist propaganda.

The more you repeat White Supremacist propaganda, the more you care. ImageImageImageImage
"If it's not from Bezos Post or the NYT or British State Media I 👏 don't 👏 want 👏 to 👏 hear 👏 it!"
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!