Roy Ngerng Profile picture
24 Feb, 16 tweets, 4 min read
The next 5 to 10, or 15 years of Taiwan's transition might be very important. China is expected to build up its capabilities to start a war, while some countries, like in Europe, are aiming to be able to manufacture leading-edge processor chips by then to compete with Taiwan's...
... semiconductor industry. This means it can no longer be business as usual for Taiwan. There's a need to review whether Taiwan's current economic model and the 5 shortages rhetoric (lack of land, water, power, manpower, and talent) contradicts with its national goals.
The 5 shortages are already irrelevant for the major export companies, which are paying higher salaries for tech talent and where youths flock to them, while their high profits can sustain increases to the costs of land, energy & water. 5 shortages should therefore be downplayed.
With Taiwan's population dwindling and wages too low to attract adequate skilled workers from other developed countries, as well as with the threat from China, each individual in Taiwan becomes increasingly important.
Each Taiwanese and individual in Taiwan therefore plays an important role in defending Taiwan, in being a potential creator for new industry niches for Taiwan, and increasingly every person will be counted on to be high-skilled in their industry due to a lack of manpower.
But this means Taiwan would need to relook its whole social capacity. Taiwan is not a 'normal' country. It needs to be a country that's kept always on its toes & currently, it's not one. Decades of hierarchical work has driven motivation and enthusiasm out of Taiwanese workers.
Using my center as an example, youths and workers do not speak up no matter how unhappy they are, for fear of angering the boss. In times of war, you cannot rely on Taiwanese being completely compliant, they won't have the flexibility to fight off attacks.
To create new industry sectors in Taiwan, decisionmakers have increasingly run out of ideas other than the usual reliance on semiconductor and ICT, and innovation needs to be decentralized to allow workers and youths to explore and come out with new niche areas.
But all these means Taiwan cannot simply follow an economic model other countries are taking. It also means depressing costs for the sake of maintaining current industries no longer work. Major industries do not need cost depression anymore anyway.
Also, it means Taiwan needs to envision a new social and political identity that would allow it to safeguard both its political and economic independence, but this would mean ensuring each Taiwanese are empowered, valued and will partake in a new nation building exercise.
To do so would mean letting go of old ideas, like the 5 shortages. It means empowering youths by strengthening unions, education reforms to allow critical discussions, higher wages to secure motivation, so that together Taiwanese will become committed to the national project.
Taiwan has reached its peak of development with #COVID19 and countries turning to Taiwan for chips. But this should not lull Taiwan into thinking its position is secured. Other countries are developing their chip industry, if not in the next 5, then the next 10 or 20 years.
Yet, Taiwan continues to overly focus on semiconductor. Other countries recognize the potential of AI, IoT and digitalization as well. While Taiwan has the tech talent and leverage currently, it needs to use this opportunity to reinvent itself. Only by investing in citizens, ...
... and innovation from the bottom-up, can Taiwan leverage on its strengths to compete with other developed countries. Taiwan does not want to continue being a contractor to other countries, especially not when they are developing their own local manufacturing expertise.
To maintain a leading edge, Taiwan therefore needs to relook its economic and social model, and to develop an approach that would meet its unique position as an independent country that needs to secure the rights and support of each individual to help safeguard the country.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roy Ngerng

Roy Ngerng Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @royngerng

24 Feb
I thought you are a UN-recognized human rights defender, my colleague mocked me. Then why didn't you speak up for us, she said. At the Taiwanese work place, hierarchy is steep and workers do not challenge bosses, for fear of losing their jobs or being scolded.
When my boss took my writings and put his name on it while omitting my name, I kept quiet. While our admin manager said that if we do did not follow the leave application procedures twice, she will deduct our bonuses, I kept quiet. We all kept quiet, because we feel powerless.
Taiwan is a democracy, but its workplaces are still authoritarian. When I finally gave my resignation letter just before lunar new year, my director told me - not everything can be democratic. As you grow older, you will become more authoritarian, he said. And this is in Taiwan.
Read 30 tweets
22 Feb
The whole of Myanmar is out in force today for the Burma Revolution to protest against the military coup and demand it moves aside. Threading photos from @cvdom2021 to show the scale.

#WhatsHappeningInMyanmar
Read 13 tweets
22 Feb
This is so touching. A person in Myanmar opens up about how he felt his silence previously made him "complicit in the genocide of Rohingya" and how recent protests have opened his eyes, and how he vows never to make the same mistake again.

#WhatsHappeningInMyanmar
The thing is, the unity in Myanmar today is allowing people to have greater empathy and solidarity with one another, it has helped to remove barriers and strengthen relationships and unity, and like I wanted with the HK protests, I want people in Myanmar to win too.
Because these social movements have such a power to transform societies and move them to another level, and if their governments are wise, it's such a powerful energy to rally, to build society, and to give people new hope and progress.
Read 4 tweets
22 Feb
In our research, Taiwanese say innovation is poor in Taiwan because the government tends to invest in big companies or companies which are already innovating and they want to make a quick buck from, and tend not to invest in SMEs. The quality of innovation is also ...
... not monitored, leading to companies reporting on good outcomes on paper but with many so-called innovations not being followed up on, or not real. Research funds are also given due to 關係 (guanxi), resulting in younger/returning Taiwanese not getting research funds.
There's of course the usual issues of Taiwan's low salary, a lack of educational reforms, which therefore means the low wages results in subpar quality work, and the system gets stuck. A culture therefore develops where Taiwanese workers do not question the system, ...
Read 14 tweets
21 Feb
What @acertainjolene is saying 👇. When authoritarian regimes oppress the voices of citizens, they start to believe their own stories, and when other countries continue to uphold so-called 'soft' authoritarians as examples, they start to think they do not need to change. And ...
... when such authoritarian models are spread across the world, it starts to embolden authoritarian regimes. There's no such thing as a 'soft' authoritarian. Believing that these regimes will come around while supporting their oppression is only allowing them to bide their time.
By the time authoritarian regimes become stronger together and democracies become more reliant on them, then democracies will be at their mercy. We can talk about localization and bringing production back to democracies, while ignoring the human rights transgressions ...
Read 11 tweets
20 Feb
Some questions Singaporeans need to ask:

The People's Action Party (PAP) is already at its 4th & 5th generation leadership. How would we rate each successive generation?

If corresponding to vote share:

1st = 73%
2nd = 67%
3rd = 64%
4th = 61%
5th = 55%?

How would you rate it?
However, at which point do we want to start rebalancing Singapore's political situation?

When PAP's performance drops below 60%? 55%? 50%?

Do we want to wait for PAP to fail miserably before we try to prepare for an alternative scenario?

Will it be too late then?
For Singapore's long term stability, is it the interest of Singaporeans to prepare Singapore's political scene for a stable transition that involves multiple parties having the ability to negotiate and perform in a manner that will facilitate a smooth transition of power.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!