"without deliberate efforts to mitigate these disparities in NIH research grant funding, what mechanisms will ensure that these new PIs will experience the success that they rightfully deserve?" -@ASCBiology Public Policy Committee:
ascb.org/science-policy…
provides important and necessary suggestions from two recent commentaries, one by a nationwide network of BME women faculty: #FundBlackScientists cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
and the second from @effatma and @The_Gilp:
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health
elifesciences.org/articles/65697
this piece was published to coincide with the most recent Meeting of the Advisory Committee to the @NIHDirector happening Friday: acd.od.nih.gov/documents/agen…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽

Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NeedhiBhalla

26 Feb
increase in success rates for AA/B applicants from ~22% to ~43% for K grants and from ~12% to ~23% for R01 grants from 2013-2020

"still very small number of investigators"
"incremental improvement"
now reporting on suggestions of group convened to discuss racism in science, mentions shift in directness of language about racism and anti-Blackness in the group
Read 37 tweets
11 Feb
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27587850/):
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27852433/):
👋🏽 Happy #WomenInScience Day!

Do what you can to fix this (from nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2021/02/01…):
Read 8 tweets
9 Feb
Who is this dude and what's his fucking point?
I CANNOT RN
yes PLEASE explain your rationale for using flood gates instead of whirlwind 🙄
Read 12 tweets
9 Feb
Love this idea of @big_data_kane using his talk @ucsc @ucscgenomics to illuminate the ontogeny of his ideas and the evolution of his thinking to the learners in the audience: "I move as I am inspired."
This talk is both a discussion of the science in his lab and its foundation in personal history and interests: What effect does environment have on scientific processes? How does context affect protein evolution, viral transmissibility and who GETS TO DO science?
Advice for young scholars: Be a historian of your own field. Studying the past can inform how you think about and do science now. It also lets you find people and ideas that you identify with.

Highlights his discovery of John Maynard Smith and this paper: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5411867/
Read 8 tweets
18 Nov 20
THAT paper is what happens when you don't recognize that gender bias is systemic and structural in academic STEM
LOOK: I have remained SANE in academic STEM b/c of my women mentors, both senior and peer, b/c we are honest about the reality of being women in STEM: the joy of doing science, the connection with trainees AND the persistent devaluation of our work, most evidently in peer review
This world *waves vaguely around*, in which academic STEM is FIRMLY situated, consistently devalues the contributions and work of women, particularly BIWoC.
Read 12 tweets
17 Nov 20
Is the NIH...unaware that access to NIH funding is often a major determinant in whether women ascend the academic hierarchy?
And I don't just mean success rates, which the NIH is good at reporting! I mean:
ability to get add'l R01s, which can be linked to promotion at some institutions
not consistently getting scores that are borderline and having to navigate that cognitive load and risk assessment
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!