A call to action for US citizens in the UK. Many critics say they can't understand why we're so concerned about the US Equality Act #HR5. What's not to like about a law that protects people from being discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation? Let us explain…/1
There are indeed wonderful things in the Equality Act which we welcome. Of course there are. But sometimes as that fabulously camp film from 2004 'Troy' reminds us, big glitzy gifts can come with hidden dangers lurking inside./2
So while there's plenty about the Act that advances our LGB rights, too much of the gay movement is so relieved after waiting so long it's reacted completely uncritically. So what IS it we fear that's lurking inside? To be clear the problem is NOT trans people.👇/3
We fully support their protection from discrimination. The problem isn't people ... it's ideology. The Act equates sex and gender identity and that is disastrous both for women and LGB peeps. Stop us if we sound like Emilia Fox as Cassandra. 👇/4
A clue to the dangers came in President Biden's Executive Order. On the one hand it says "All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.“ Bravo. We agree. But then came the kicker..../5
The EO instructs federal agencies on how to interpret the Supreme Court's Bostock ruling but itself totally misinterprets it. While the Bostock majority ruling mentioned gender identity only once and sex at least 200 times the EO equates one with the other./6
That might not SOUND like a big deal. But it is. We’re same-SEX attracted. If SEX = gender identity then we become attracted to people who SAY they are the sex we are attracted to. That’s NOT who we believe we are. It's also not why we’ve been discriminated against./7
For centuries we were told we should sleep and marry people of the opposite sex. Now the Equality Act ends up doing much the same; defining gays as those who can sleep and date people of the opposite sex. The EA is a Trojan Horse smuggling homophobia back into our lives./8
It's not compulsory. Not yet. But there IS pressure on lesbians to consider transwomen as our partners. Males who were straight men now expect to become attractive to lesbians by declaring themselves female. This article explores this absurdity 👇/9 thearticle.com/can-biological…
The proposed Equality Act will encourage this gaslighting of lesbians. But the confusion of gender identity with sex will have another impact that will detonate loudly among voters of all orientations and political persuasions: SPORT. 👇/10
School sports are a crucial route to success and college. It's unfair girls are now facing competitors who have the biological advantage of having been born male. Here's research from biologist @FondOfBeetles that shows the advantage is overwhelming./11 👇savewomenssports.com/science¬
As if that wasn't bad enough @AbigailShrier has described the impact of the Equality Act's confusion of sex with gender identity as a present danger to women's safety. She's right. We applaud her clarion call to defend women's single sex spaces.👇wsj.com/articles/the-t… /12
As she says, "The Equality Act sacrifices female safety in restrooms, locker rooms and even domestic-violence shelters". Wherever self ID of gender has been introduced and males given access to female spaces problems have emerged; as in Ireland. 👇womenarehuman.com/transgender-te… /13
So what can YOU do? Please call on Congress to amend the Equality Act to recognize and protect biological sex as distinct from gender identity. It's not necessary to redefine sex as the Act proposes in order to protect transgender people from discrimination./14
If you care about our rights as LGB people, girls' sport and women and girls' safety then please write to your representative. Some people may tell you not to look a gift horse in the mouth. When it come to both horses and laws we prefer to do just that./15
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We will be live tweeting again today in the preliminary employment tribunal hearing on @BluskyeAllison’s claim against Garden Court Chambers (GC) and @stonewalluk (SW).
To follow the live tweeting, it will be helpful to read Allison’s account of the events leading up to her claim in her crowdfunder. allisonbailey.co.uk
We are live tweeting from the preliminary hearing of the Employment Tribunal case in which #AllisonBailey is suing Stonewall and Garden Court chambers.
The judge has ruled that for this hearing only, the names should remain redacted.
It is a Rule 50 Order. These particular individuals are members of Stonewall’s Trans Advisory Group and their names may well be known elsewhere. What is relevant is the messages from the group to Garden Court.
What is wrong with you @nytimes? It’s not conservative to accept the reality that males and females are biologically different. Every person on the planet was born from a female./1of8 nytimes.com/2021/01/31/opi…
“You’d think that legislation affecting the lives of so many young people would be based on hard research and science.” Yes it is! @WorldRugby cites *dozens* of scientific studies in its decision to keep women’s rugby safe. Sex, not gender, is based on science./2of8
Homophobia is dislike of or prejudice against gays and lesbians. We will oppose it whatever form it takes. We oppose it when it is based on regressive, traditionalist, religious, sexist bias branded as “family values”./1of4
We oppose it when it is based on the regressive stereotypes and sexist bias known as “gender identity” and falsely branded as “inclusiveness”. The belief that “sex” should be replaced by “gender” excludes and is hostile to people with same-sex sexual orientation./2of4
We oppose homophobia whether it comes from the right or the left. Whether those who attack us call themselves conservative or progressive./3of4
If this hearing on 12th Jan is successful, we will see the first judicial review of whether it is appropriate for a govt dept or other public body to be a member of @stonewalluk Diversity Champions scheme. Why is this important?
Because if it goes ahead the court will look at @cpsuk who are charged with “institutional bias” from their membership of the controversial scheme. Membership involves completing an annual questionnaire to receive a rating.@stonewalluk advises members on how to achieve top marks
There are 100s of public sector bodies who belong: @HouseofCommons@UKHouseofLords@WelshGovernment@scotgov, universities, armed forces, police, NHS & regulatory bodies. All receive higher marks if they agree to @stonewalluk gender identity theory which has no grounding in law
Max was 11 years old and Ash was 8. Their stories were told in the 2016 documentary on the Tavistock GIDS clinic “Kids on the Edge: the Gender Clinic”. The clinic’s management was delighted with the documentary. Its director, Dr Polly Carmichael, said enthusiastically:/1of12
”We all feel proud to have been involved in the process and that we could not have wished for more in the way that they approached and conducted the whole process.”/2of12
Peter Beard, for the Guardian, enthused in his review: “I hope the people who rage about such things might also find the time to watch The Gender Clinic, which does a steady job of dismantling many of the panicked, inaccurate fears around what is clearly a complex process.”/3of12