Karnataka HC is hearing two plea moved by Amazon and Flipkart to quash order passed by Competition Commission of India alleging violations of competition law.

@Flipkart
@amazonIN
@CCI_India
ASG Madhavi Divan appearing for CCI: We cannot turn a blind eye to the material before us. Material before us was multi-fold.
Divan: Exhaustive arguments have been made from the other side. But I think the Section 26 of the Competition Act has not been read in full to your Lordship. I think that is problematic.

Key to understanding S. 26 (1) comes from rest of the provision.
Divan: Other side has argued that order passed by the CCI is unreasonable, there is no application if mind etc.

There is a prima facie case. I will come to that, your Lordship.
Divan: If we proceed on the wrong footing, we will get the wrong answers....
Divan: Arguments have been made on Appario, Cloudtail Frontizo etc.
Amazon has been dissecting the facts.

It is very doubtful whether this can be done before writ court..
Divan: But if we look at it, who is best placed to dissect these facts? The Director General. Let him do this job.
Divan: The Supreme Court, in a case has said why the person making a complaint in a competition law matter becomes the "informant" and not a complainant. Because these proceedings are in rem.
At the end of the day, the DG is authorized to do the fact finding exercise: Divan
Divan: Mr Subramanium (appearing for Amazon) has contended that confidentiality of the investigation was not maintained. That CCI had given made it public and it has affected their reputation. The SALE judgement was cited.
Divan: The SALE judgment does not talk about confidentiality.

It says confidentiality will have to be maintained if some trade secret is involved.
Why should the CCI keep the order of investigation is secret? The proceedings are in rem: Divan
The matter has been argued before the Court as if there has been a full fledged adjudication by the CCI.

In fact, we are very far from adjudication: Divan
We only want solid credible data...DG will do the fact finding exercise after which the parties will be called to make their case: Divan
On the point of online marketplace, we agree with them: Divan
There has been an exponential growth in online market in the past one year, owing to the pandemic: Divan
Due to the pandemic, even people who want to touch and feel the product, see the product before buying, have switched to online market: Divan
It is extremely important to preserve the sanctity of online market place: Divan
Divan submits that she would address the Court on the aspect of FDI Policy as well.
These are points I would like to raise. I dont know how much time your Lordship has today: Divan

If you are done with your preamble, you can start afresh tomorrow: Justice PS Dinesh Kumar.
Justice Kumar: You can give your reply to the arguments made by the petitioners. If possible.

It will be easy for me.

Divan: I can do that next week.

Justice Kumar: Yes yes.
Divan: Will the matter be taken at 3 or 3:30 tomorrow milord?

Justice Kumar: Let us keep it at 3:30.

Adjourned to February 26.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

25 Feb
"Use of name 'Tandav' offensive, sentiments of majority community hurt:" Allahabad High Court rejects anticipatory bail plea of Aparna Purohit

@Areebuddin14 reports.

#allahabadhighcourt #Tandav

@PrimeVideoIN
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Allahabad HC Justice Siddharth said

"that there was a deliberate and malicious intention on the part of Purohit to outrage religious feelings, which would attract the offence under Section 153-A of the IPC".

#tandav #AmazonPrimeVideo
Submission of apology or withdrawal of these scenes after they were streamed would not absolve the accused persons of the offence committed by them, the Allahabad HC said.

#Tandav #TandavOnPrime #AmazonPrimeVideo
Read 7 tweets
25 Feb
#BombayHighCourt grants additional week to #ArnabGoswami to make chargesheet related amendments to his plea filed challenging his arrest and detention by the Raigad Police in the abetment to suicide case of #AnvayNaik.

@republic
Court had been approached in December 2020 to assail the chargesheet in his plea in December 2020 after cognizance was taken of the chargesheet filed by Raigad Police.

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Bench of Justice SS Shinde had allowed them to make the necessary amendments.

Advocate Niranjan Mundargi submitted to the court that they had received the “voluminous chargesheet” only in January 2021 and thereafter they were granted 3 weeks to carry out amendments.
Read 5 tweets
25 Feb
Sr Adv Anand Grover mentioned application on behalf of #BhimaKoregaonCase accused #varavararao for allowing deposit of temporary cash bail valid for a period of 2 months till they make arrangements for solvent sureties.
He stated that the application is being filed and they have to procure the signatures of Rao on the affidavit.

#BhimaKoregaonCase
#VaravaraRao
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and Manish Pitale orally requested Chief PP Deepak Thakare to allow Rao’s lawyer Adv Satyanarayanan to visit him in the hospital for signatures.

#BhimaKoregaonCase
#VaravaraRao
Read 7 tweets
25 Feb
#Breaking: Centre tells Delhi High Court that in spite of decriminalisation homosexuality, one cannot claim a fundamental right with respect to same-sex marriage.

Centre says issue of legal recognition of #SameSexMarriage can't be decided by court.

#LGBTQI
Centre says that in India, marriage is a bond between a biological man
and a biological woman.

Living together as same-sex partners is not comparable with the Indian concept of a family unit, Centre states.

#LGBTQI
#SameSexMarriage

@pib_law
[Breaking] No fundamental right of same-sex marriage, legal recognition can't be given by court: Central government tells Delhi High Court

[FULL STORY] by @aditi2118

#DelhiHighCourt #LGBTQI

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 4 tweets
25 Feb
[Social Media Regulation]: Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad addresses media. Law Minister addresses press conference on new rules and guidelines
@rsprasad

@OfficeOfRSP
Government welcomes right to dissent: @rsprasad

@OfficeOfRSP
Government says the focus is on the redressal mechanism and the rights of users on a social media platform: Ravi Shankar Prasad

@rsprasad @OfficeOfRSP
Read 14 tweets
25 Feb
Delhi High Court begins hearing a batch of petitions concerning #DelhiRiots of February 2020.

Hearing before Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh.

#DelhiRiots2020
Senior Advocate Colin Gonsalves for one of the petitioners: Pleadings are complete. We are ready whenever the court says.

Other Petitioner counsel also say that pleadings are complete.

#DelhiRiots
Petitioner in person Ajay Gautam says he has filed rejoinder, makes submissions.

Court is holding hybrid hearing.

While judges are sitting physically in court room, some advocates are appearing before it virtually.

#DelhiRiots
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!