@rmannina86 Generally agree, however... the assessment is not in any sense gender-neutral. It’s like judging monkeys and elephants by how well they climb trees. Image
@rmannina86 First, the leg tuck is supposed to measure abdominal strength/endurance... but somehow we went from another abdominal test (the sit-up) where women generally outperformed men, to a concern that most women can’t pass the leg tuck
@rmannina86 And that’s because, a standard pull up bar is sized for a male hand. And grip strength around that diameter bar is the best predictor of leg tuck success.
But that bar size doesn’t translate to anything we need to grip in normal duties (ammo cans, water jugs etc are all smaller)
@rmannina86 This also hampers deadlift and kettlebell performance.

And the medicine ball throw is equally absurd. The chief predictor of distance is release height...and again, women, regardless of their training or fitness, are generally disadvantaged.
@rmannina86 No amount of training will make you taller... but does tall make you a better soldier? Certainly not.

So is the premise of Kristen Griest article still good? Yes, gender neutral standards help combat gender stereotypes and undercut baseless criticism... but the ACFT ain’t it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul M. Kearney

Paul M. Kearney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GStrategerist

1 Mar
Dear MilTwitter,

I apologize that I am not a kinesiologist but lets not let that stop me!

The #ACFT is the talk of the town!
Even the @16thSMA wants you to run it in order to build the data set for analysis.

Let's call this the LitReview for the EverySoldier (TM)
First, let me thank/hate @rmannina86 for making me do this. Your incessant prodding is a credit to yourself, the 2 Cavalry Regt and the US Army.
The most important read to understand the ACFT is "Baseline Soldier Physical Readiness Requirements Study" published in NOV 2019
iadlest.org/Portals/0/AD10…
Read 28 tweets
30 Dec 20
What if... stay with me here... we married standards with effectiveness?

A brief thread... (1/n)
Hair standards for women have been awful. Just ask @gilltheamazon or @evo_kositz or @Accidental_E9 or like any woman in uniform. (/2)
But women’s hair isn’t the only generally arbitrary appearance standards.

A worthwhile natural experiment can be tattoo standards. (/3)
Read 9 tweets
6 Feb 20
Forgive a RT, but this requires more than 280 characters:

Deterrence requires a signal to an adversary that an ally/thing is above the threshold of response. Sometimes to reassure allies we place assets at risk (units in Europe, @PatDonahoeArmy in ROK etc)/1
The RAND study recently released shows that assets heavy units are stronger in general deterrent value. In terms of the study, Units are coded heavy v light, bomber v fighter, etc /2
When coded in this way, the least mobile units had the most deterrent effect. With heavy ground at the top and air assets at the bottom. This begs the question: what accounts for their deterrent value? /3
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!