The pandemic changed a lot of teaching for the worse, but I wanted to tweet how it spurred me to try to change the way we teach international policy and development @HarrisPolicy.

In short, we took the opportunity to try to get policymakers all over the world to teach classes.
One of the classes I'm most excited about is led by the staff of @BusaraCenter, a behavioral laboratory in Nairobi. A range of East African researchers, faculty, and Busara VP @MSchomerus are leading a class on behavioral research and economics. Students will run real studies!
What I liked the most is the theme Busara proposed -- representational and diversity issues in development, and what it means to be running research when there's such a power differential. So a quant class with meaningful anthropology, psychology, etc baked in. It's amazing.
I'm also excited about Carlos Fernandez, until recently the Central Bank governor of Paraguay. He'll be teaching on international finance & macro development. Having classes taught by sr policy makers from their home countries is a privilege that the pandemic pushed us to try.
Not everyone is coming from the other side of the planet. I'm keen to see @AnBrownDC teach a class on global health. She's an executive and research director @FHI360, a huge nonprofit focused on health. She directs their evidence unit.
Also teaching from Washington is @Gyude_Moore, previously Liberia’s Minister of Public Works and now a fellow at @CGDev. He'll be teaching a class on infrastructure and development, but is also a really deep thinker on Africa's foreign policy towards the rest of the world.
As an aside, when we get back to normal, I'm hoping we can move these from Zoom to hybrid classes, where scholar-practitioners from around the world can come to @HarrisPolicy for a few weeks and then teach the rest of the quarter remote. Or maybe students go to them!
We will see what the new post-pandemic world brings, but I don't want to stop this model when it's over. I think it's working. I want to embrace and expand it, bringing more and more policymakers from outside the US into our real or virtual classrooms.
I digress. I am also happy that we could get @MiguelSantos12 from the Harvard Growth Lab to teach a class on economic growth policy. Our regular faculty tend to be more micro and political economy in focus, and lecturers like Miguel are how we ensure our students are well served
We also have Heddy Lahmann, an education scholar, teaching on education policy in developing countries, a great complement to our own @AAdukia
These new lecturers join a big collection of existing ones, like Rep. Mike Quigley, who represents Illinois in Congress and sits on the Intelligence Committee. He teaches a class here on... the intelligence services.
Our niche @HarrisPolicy: we try to be the most quantitative and technical MPP program on the market, feeding that huge demand.

It shapes how we choose lecturers too. We are typically looking for scholar-practitioners--people who apply these technical skills in their careers.
This isn't for everybody. I tell our new admits, as they weigh schools, that every policy school tries to serve different needs, and that's a good thing. Some schools aim to be a pipeline into the foreign service. Others have courses by policy stars telling war stories in class.
If you are a student, you need to choose the right fit for the skills and career you want. (And then go to the place that sends you the least in debt!)

My full advice post on choosing a degree here: chrisblattman.com/2013/10/04/wha…
Our philosophy @HarrisPolicy simple: we don't want lots of specialized degrees. We want most students to come in as a big 2-year MPP or 1-year MA cohort, do an advanced common core together, then choose specializations after through certificates.
Anyways, I won't feature all our international policy and development classes and faculty here. But a few highlights:

Oeindrila Dube leads our conflict curriculum, which is a whole other related certificate, and HUGE. She teaches classes on conflict's causes and consequences.
And @RebeccaJWolfe leads our international development & conflict policy labs (classes where you do real projects with real clients) and teaches on humanitarianism too.
@AmirJina teaches classes on climate, the enviroment and development, and has been teaching our core economic development classes too.
Fer Sobrino, who does amazing research on Mexican drug markets, teaches data science classes
James Robinson of @WhyNationsFail and Raul Sanchez de la Sierra teach a class on African development, and Raul also teaches our Political Economy of Developing Countries class (my old stomping ground)
This year I'm teaching a new "capstone class" that I am super excited about. It's more about the how to do policy, and critical analysis of how policy is done, that "what policy". Twitter helped me with my reading list. Here is the final one:
Of course we are also super excited to welcome recent Nobel-laureate Michael Kremer to our development group. Stay tuned for huge developments in the Development Innovation Lab
Oh and by the way the Lab is advertising for a founding director!
Stay tuned for more, as we are really ramping up hiring in this area this year and next. There will be many new faces soon.

Also, apologies to all the colleagues I missed. There are limits to my threads! A full list of international classes is here:
harris.uchicago.edu/academics/desi…
Finally, guess what? We even teach OTHER SUBJECTS. From energy to health to public finance to political campaigns and analytical methods (plus more), we have a ton of certificates. Check them out:

harris.uchicago.edu/academics/desi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Blattman

Chris Blattman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cblatts

23 Feb
OK folks. What are your favorite book jackets out there? My publisher Viking has asked me for thoughts. The working title of my book is Why We Fight.
My target audience is the RNC whom I hope will buy as many copies of my book as they did Donald Trump Jr.'s
In addition, I think the audience is people who bought Why Nations Fail, Better Angels, or Guns Germs and Steel.
Read 4 tweets
5 Feb
Here's a story of unintended consequences, of academic theories and government policy gone wrong, of how damn hard it is to tackle organized crime, and of insights into what criminal organizations really want and do.

It starts in Medellin.

[Paper: osf.io/preprints/soca…]
First thing you need to know: Every low and middle income neighborhood in the city has a neighborhood gang called a combo. We did a census of them. Here's how it looks. Every square inch is claimed by one combo or another.
This is valuable territory. There's a healthy retail drug market. They make and collect loans. Some even run local monopolies on staples like arepas, eggs, yogurt, and cooking gas in neighborhoods like this.
Read 25 tweets
5 Feb
[Continued from previous thread]

When we left off, we were talking about what happened when states try to improve governing in underserved neighborhoods. Here's a "caravana" they held in each neighborhood, alongside the liaisons, where all agencies comes out to the sector.
After two years of intense state governance, relative state went down!!

Note: when we launched this with the city, we expected crowding out, and never expected the "crowding in" effect to dominate.
Now, to be clear, we don't see clear evidence of a rise in absolute levels of combo rule. There are some signs that the state struggled to deliver, and that decreased people's happiness with the state. But even where it worked well: no evidence of crowding out!
Read 15 tweets
4 Dec 20
it’s great that economists do lots of field work and interviews now. But think of the absolute sloppiest, terrible causal inference paper you can remember, from someone who doesn’t even know that they don’t know what they’re doing.

That’s how economists do qualitative research.
We can probably do better. We shouldn’t expect most papers to do better than that. But surely some papers should?

What percent? Even 1% using qualitative work to motivate a theory or understand the results of a program evaluation would be more than happens
Often these are econ-ethnographer partnerships. Some good collaborations I can think of:

Morduch and Rutherford and coauthors on financial diaries

Levitt and Venkatesh on Chicago gangs

Anything with Ensminger
Read 12 tweets
1 Oct 20
OK who wants a thread on why gangs rule? Not why gangs are great. I mean, when and how do they govern civilians.

Here we are meeting one gang leader who, besides running the drug trade, has built this crafts school behind him, a recycling center, and a community pool.
This isn't a slum. It's a middle income neighborhood in Medellin, Colombia. Nearly every low- and middle income neighborhood in the city has a resident gang called a combo.

We spent 4 years interviewing dozens of members and leaders of 31 criminal groups.
Here's a map of the city. We also surveyed 7000 people on what services state and combos provide. Medium & dark red indicate a combo intervenes in disputes, crime, and disorder more than the state.

(By we I mean @SantiagoTobon @BigBigBLessing & @gusduncan with @poverty_action)
Read 17 tweets
24 Sep 20
As the school year kicks off & grad students start signing up to see profs, here are some thoughts about planning your research.

To me, the 2 questions PhD students ought to ask themselves:

1. How will this research change people's beliefs?
2. Who are those people?
These are probably the two questions I ask students again and again, and it leads to better research.

This is certainly true with empirical research. Students are consumed with credible causality. So they get really excited when they think about a way to identify something.
But often, others already buy their hypothesis. So the study is unlikely to change beliefs. Sure we might learn something from checking. But a study, or at least a dissertation, needs to have a big ex-ante capacity to surprise us or change our minds about something important.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!