Lots of chatter about Twitter possibly adding a feature to allow accounts to charge for access to their content.
I don’t think folks understand that they aren’t talking about paying to see someone’s tweets.
They’re talking about additional content beyond tweets.
1/3
There are a lot of passionate journalists, activists and writers on here who are kept from creating more content by needing to pay the bills.
I’m just a person who tweets.
There are a lot of people who produce valuable content though - or would if they could afford it.
2/3
I posted a few weeks ago that the volume of stuff I have posted in the past four years - valueless though it may have been - is the equivalent of 15 novels.
I would absolutely pay some accounts the equivalent of a cup of coffee a month to create additional content I value.
3/3
...because I know how much time, effort and thought goes into writing anything let alone something thoughtful, researched and informative.
Weird to me that Twitter has evolved into a place where people lament low wages while also laughing at the idea of paying for others’ work.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The stupid faux-virtue of “real-naming” is just annoying AF.
We live in a world where women in particular are subjected to abuse, threats and real-life dangers for doing nothing more than existing online.
Demanding people expose themselves to danger to please you is ridiculous.
Okay, I’m a little revved up about this so I am just going to go off.
When I joined Twitter, I didn’t actually care about anonymity. I just made up an account name and used it. Once this whole thing inexplicably took on a life of its own, I began planning to “out myself”.
To keep that from being so difficult I rupture something, I would just ask that people consider this:
The impeachment wasn’t about a trial.
It was about a media event.
It was a television series and Dems were the producers.
1/
Dems concentrated it down to a few days; ran it when it would be least watched; and then agreed to yank it off the air.
Reconsider your evaluation through that lens.
Did Dems get the most value they could’ve out of this production?
(For ref, see the Benghazi hearings)
2/
And now I’m going to go mute “impeachment” and try to stay true to my word here.
We Dems have a hard time understanding what Republicans have always known: keep an attack on TV long enough and it does damage - no matter how it ends. Even if you lose.
3/
This morning’s little treasure defies description. A neo-soul, R&B, roller smooth as a satin pillowcase.
At the 3:15 mark, if your head ain’t bopping, you’re dead.
1/
Sault is a largely anonymous group out of the UK that blends together influences into seven-layer dips that wend and weave through chill to funk and back.
Their latest was produced by Inflo who also produced the great Michael Kiwanuka’s last album.