In nuclear warfare, it’s that country state or entity who is able to survive an attack or a series of attacks with very little damage and which possesses the power to withhold its tremendous attack capability in face of severe provocation which will eventually win.
One does well to remember this basic doctrine. It is when someone has the capability to survive a first strike or series of strikes that they become known and called as a superpower.
Why does any country have a no first strike doctrine?
China and India have the no first use /strike doctrine.
UK, USA and France say that it will use the first strike BUT only if there is invasion/attack or invasion/attack of its supporting NATO states or thereabouts...
UK, USA and France say that it will use the first strike BUT only if there is invasion/attack or invasion/attack of its supporting NATO states or thereabouts...
The odd ones out are Pakistan and Russia. Why are their doctrines different..., in Pakistan’s case, their weapons/supply chains etc run out in 4 days...
but what about Russia?
but what about Russia?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
