I continue to be amazed that it is not universally understood that Donald Trump is a domestic terror leader
Trump is not, now, chiefly identifiable as a former president, a businessman, a private citizen living in Florida, the leader of a political movement, or a prospective criminal defendant in various financial crimes cases
He is a domestic terror leader and he will act accordingly
Just because Trump's American insurrection is slower-moving than prior insurrections in America or many insurrections worldwide does not make it any less of an insurrection or Donald Trump any less of a domestic terror leader—and media better start understanding this immediately
For Trump to renounce his present status as the nation's chief domestic terror leader he'd need to publicly inform his cultists that he lied to them about the 2020 general election, concede that Biden is America's legitimate president, and declare that he's retiring from politics
Until those things happen, Trump should be investigated by state/federal law enforcement as a domestic terror leader, covered by media as a domestic terror leader, and shunned by all politicians and all voters as a domestic terror leader
Any other course of action is *dangerous*
My basis for saying this is that I've written more bestsellers in the English language about Donald Trump's political career than any American author, and have dedicated my life since 2015 to informing the public of the grave national security threat this man poses to *all* of us
I don't think Trumpists yet realize that if Trump collapses our democracy as he *with every fiber of his being* intends to do, it'll endanger every one of us financially, physically, emotionally, spiritually, and socioculturally
No one won't suffer if Trump does what he plans to
And please don't pretend January 6 was the first domestic terror event inspired by Trump's leadership as a domestic terror leader
It was the sixth or seventh such incident, and they grow worse each time
The trendline is clear and still no one takes any legal or political action
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the last five years of following Maggie Haberman, I've never once seen her distinguish between the word "journalist" and the word "reporter." When she does that for the first time, this journalism professor—who teaches 25 genres of journalism—will take her expertise seriously.
The four principles that govern responsible reportage are objectivity, accuracy, transparency and honesty. When you overuse anonymous sources, continue using sources after they've lied to you, and engage in access journalism, you violate the latter three of these four principles.
I encourage people to read widely about 21st c. journalism. This semester I'm teaching a course on the subject at UNH, so I know how complex, subtle and thorny the topic is. Anyone selling you a line about how journalism works that sounds like it came from 1950 should be ignored.
(THREAD) I'm publishing, at PROOF, excerpts from my NYT-bestselling 2019 book Proof of Conspiracy that detail the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. This content is for subscribers for PROOF. Reader discretion is advised, due to the violent nature of the content. sethabramson.substack.com/p/part-i-addit…
(PS) It's a weird day for anyone who read Proof of Conspiracy. Many Americans are learning about CSMARC for the first time today—even as readers of Proof of Conspiracy read a chapter with that title in Summer '19. If media thought this was important, it should've covered it then.
(PS2) Media should never ask why it is losing popularity when it has spent the last four years attacking a person who wrote about today's breaking news a year and a half ago. The question media *should* be asking is, why did we put our hatred of this guy over doing our damn jobs?
The Steele dossier remains one of the most lied-about items of the whole Trump presidency. Republicans lie about Steele's background, motivations, knowledge, funders and claims. They lie about the dossier timeline and they lie about its provenance and they lie about its accuracy.
We must also understand that it's no surprise that Republicans lie about the dossier. When the author of a dossier tells you in advance that 30% of it is likely inaccurate, as long as you lie about him telling you that and claim he didn't you can spend years pointing out the 30%.
Steele is an honorable man who had been a valuable FBI partner for years when *Republicans* approached him to try to keep Donald Trump from the presidency. When the GOP folded and accepted Trump as its Lord and Savior, a law firm hired Steele to continue his overseas work.
Anyone else feel like each time we see a new video from Donald Trump Jr. he's desended one sub-basement deeper into a subterranean cavern stocked to the ceiling on each floor with whatever it is that makes him sweaty, puffy, bloodshot-eyed, and prone to affecting a strange drawl?
If I were someone who cared about Donald Trump Jr.'s health—which candidly I'm ambivalent about—I'd tell him to get some fresh air and maybe record a video from a meadow or something talking about the Great Outdoors rather than how his family can continue to degrade our democracy
This article puts me in a category with {rechecks article} President John Adams and President Joe Biden. No one else is in the category. I'm pretty sure this will never happen again.
I have thoughts on this topic, but am working on other things right now. vice.com/en/article/qjp…
What I'll say briefly is we really need *former* public defenders tweeting, as they're not bound in the ways current ones are; we need more tweeting on first principles, alongside tweeting about types of cases; we need tweeting from PDs who've worked with every type of community.
Also, it should go without saying—though incredibly, it *doesn't* in this article—that those of us who believe in equality under law should be cheering *every PD* getting the word out on this topic, without cynically tallying retweets or likes like it's a zero-sum game. It's not.