That is pretty big speech from a Nation who borrows all their culture from other nations. And, like there are other First Nations, there are other Metis peoples and cultures. I don't owe you anything, Mr Little Man. Take your misogynistic gaslighting elsewhere. @billy_isenor 
You are not from my community, I don't know who the hell you think you are, demanding anything from me. I do not claim to be from your community and you sure as hell do not speak for mine. Am I clear enough for you Billy?
You can stop with the bull shitting speeches, cause McCargar case has already stated that the Non Profit Society the Metis National Council does not speak for any other community other than the registered members of their own through their own constitution and bylaws, so you can
take your opinions and stick them straight where the sun don't shine ..
Just because you noticed and liked my highlighting Billy, MNC is not who litigated the Harry Daniels case. CAP did. You know the other national organization who has an accord with the Canadian Gov to represent those Metis who are not represented through MNC.
It is those people represented in sec 117./ Let's see who those people are Billy. After that big flowery speech you just spieled, lol sec 117 - Harry Daniels case describing the core group of MNSI as a group of native people who maintained a strong affinity for their Indian
Heritage without possessing Indian status sec. 117./ So Billy, those people are not MNC Metis. So sorry to disappoint you and your bullshitting story. NCC/CAP has a totally different definition of what it means to be Metis and they are the ones who repatriated the Metis
into the 1982 constitution./ Constitutional meeting not a complete failure - March 1984 - New Breed - The definition proposed by MNC did not receive approval by the Native Council of Canada. (because there is no definition of who is Metis) and Billy, it was really quite moving
how deep you dived into that romantic Metis history of the nomadic Metis, that is in no way shape or form, YOU. You and your MNC go by the 2002 definitions of a non profit society who was formed in 1983 and registered in 1985. You can't get much more colonial than that, so do not
try that on for size on someone who knows your history Billy. You didn't even need to be Native in your association in 1978. So whatever makes you think you have the balls to go online and question others on their heritage? The History of the Manitoba Metis Federation -
Tony Lussier writing in 1978 states - Today a Metis is defined by the MMF as:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
