Ending the week with a tweet storm!

Today I want to talk about margins in a business. I don't think it's addressed enough, and I'm going to walk through a concrete example that reflects some of my conversations w/ founders this week

Read on >>
1) First, what are margins? There are so many different accounting terms: gross profit, net profit, etc.

To keep things simple - in this case, I'm talking about gross profit. I.e. If you sell a pair of shoes for $100. And it cost you $50 to buy in wholesale, your margin is 50%.
2) In other words, it's what you get after paying for the cost of goods but before paying for the overhead of your team and marketing expenditures.

Ok onwards >>
3) Example 1: A friend of mine was looking at a subscription box company to invest in and asked me what I thought about the business.

Here's how I'd think about it as either an investor or the biz owner.

How much can you sell the box for to consumers? $20/mo? $30/mo?
4) You want to charge as much as you can without causing ppl to churn. Based on what they were offering in the box, I felt that I might pay $30/mo as a consumer.

Now how much would the cost of goods cost? Maybe they can buy the items at wholesale. Or get some for free even.
5) But at scale, I felt that it would be hard to get all the items for free. So maybe the COGs is $15/box/mo.

This means that the business gets $15/box/mo - which it has to use to cover all overhead (office / salaries / etc) + marketing.
6) Some ppl might say that 50% margins are good. But it's not the margins that matter -- it's the actual amount that you get that matters.

In this case - it's the $15/box/mo.
7) The critical piece many ppl underestimate is how much time & money cust acq requires.

For this particular demographic, at SCALE, I think in ad channels, it would cost $70-$120 to successfully acquire a user. This is based on seeing a lot of cos go after this audience.
8) If say it costs $100, then your payback period would be $100/$15 = 7 months payback.

For a pre-seed startup w out funding, this is TOO LONG. But even they had money, the concern is that it will be hard to make money.
9) After the 7 mo payback, you still have to retain the customer to pay off some overhead of your team and then eventually actually MAKE MONEY! And a lot of "nice to have" consumer subscription companies aren't able to retain the ave customer for 1+ yr.
10) You could argue that they could use non-ad channels to find cheaper channels. Maybe SEO - though for their category it's incredibly crowded to rise above the noise. Maybe partnerships -- ala bloggers and influencers, but again for this category hard to rise above the noise.
11) The pt of this story is NOT to dissuade you from starting or investing in subscription box companies. But you have to think through the unit economics.

How much are YOU going to make on a transaction? And will mktg and overhead start to fit into that gross profit?
12) And will you retain the customer long enough to get past your payback period and actually make money? Or will they churn because it's a nice-to-have product?
13) The wildcard is that sometimes the initial business unit economics can be bad, but if you can muddle through it to get enough volume going, then maybe you can layer on additional business models to increase the lifetime value and make money.
14) If you don't have a good sense of what your CAC could be at scale, do some quick research. I haven't checked recently, but the Google Ads API gives you a sense of CPC for various keywords. Do you some landing page tests.
15) Even if you don't use ads, I still think this tends is a good proxy for the cost of other channels. The higher the CAC, the more competitive the space. It also means it will be a dogfight for partnerships & mindshare in SEO -- it's not any LESS competitive in non-ad channels.
16) These are not perfect tests but good proxies to how hard or easy the customer acquisition will be and will give you a sense of your payback period. And if it's long, then you will need a lot of capital to bridge yourself for that long.
17) And maybe you start the business but maybe you don't. But whatever you decide, you should have a good sense of how "tight" the numbers will end up being.

Just some Friday thoughts to end the week.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth Yin

Elizabeth Yin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dunkhippo33

25 Feb
Today's thread is on "good ideas" in B2B.

A bit of a deeper dive on yesterday's thread:

More >>

1) First off - "good ideas" are in the eye of the beholder :D. Even within our own @HustleFundVC team, we often DISAGREE!

We have a champion model, which means that if I want to invest, I can. Even if @ericbahn doesn't want to.
2) But we believe independent thought is impt and good for portfolio construction. So to some extent, there's luck in approaching the "right partner" @HustleFundVC who likes a given business.

But enough caveating - onwards!
Read 20 tweets
24 Feb
People have often asked me how I make decisions at pre-seed when there is no information.

@HustleFundVC we invest pre-revenue (I don't care about traction at all).

A thread >>
1) At a high level, the startup idea matters a lot.

In fact, I personally think (and my own teammates will certainly debate me on this) the idea matters more than the founders. 😮

(Que the tomato throwing)
2) This is NOT to say founders don't matter. They DEFINITELY DO. There's something special when amazing founders work on amazing business ideas.
Read 26 tweets
22 Feb
To celebrate our Fund 2 launch, we are hosting a 24-hour Clubhouse event starting tmrw at 8am PT (Tues Feb 23)

Here's a glimpse of the schedule that may be interesting to both founders and investors

Read on >>
1) 8am-10am and again at 4pm-6pm, we'll talk about how we raised our Fund 1 and our Fund 2.

Are you an emerging fund manager or angel thinking about starting a fund or raising the next one? Ask us anything:

2) 10am-11am Our newest team member @will_bricker will talk about jumping into VC.

Trying to land a job in VC? Ask Will anything -- this is a quick background on how he got his job w/ us:

Read 14 tweets
22 Feb
Today's tweetstorm is on

How We Tripled Our First VC Fund to Raise a $33.6m Fund 2

elizabethyin.com/2021/02/22/how…

Will cover key learnings & new tactics not mentioned in my Fund 1 post.

Read on >>
1) (This is my Fund 1 post: How we raised our $11.5m VC Fund 1)

elizabethyin.com/2018/12/19/how…
2) A major hurdle was running into the 99 investor limit per SEC rules. Because VC funds (for the most part) can only take 99 investors, we had to turn away a LOT of $100k-$250k checks in order to raise a larger fund.

Mindblowing right?
Read 11 tweets
20 Feb
VCs and fund-of-funds are going to throw tomatoes at me with today's tweet storm:

Ownership *doesn't matter* for early stage investing.

And yet almost every VC and fund-of-fund cares about it. 😮

Here's why >>
1) First some context. Fund-of-funds and VCs are always talking about needing to buy enough ownership in their portfolio companies.

But almost no one questions why.
2) But here's a thought experiment. If you invested $5k into Uber's seed round and held on to the IPO, you would have made ~$25m.

$5k doesn't buy you any ownership. So is that a failed investment? Obviously not.
Read 25 tweets
19 Feb
Today's tweet storm is about business strategy at your startup.

If you think about building a company, it's a bit akin to one of those resource allocation board games. You know - like Catan or Tzolk'in or 7 Wonders -- stuff like that.

What is the strategy for your startup? >>
1) If you don't play resource allocation games, the general premise is that you try to amass resources (i.e. an audience), and then at some pt in the game you need to figure out how to turn those resources into victory points (i.e. monetization).

The same applies to startups.
2) In the most ideal world - infinite time and runway, the strategy is always focus on amassing resources. Then you can in one fell swoop monetize super easily all at once (more or less).

However, in both the game and real life you don't have infinite time and runway.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!