GenderGP doubling down on its medical & business model by accusing @Telegraph of fake news & attacks upon it. However comparison of Telegraph story with #GenderGP own elaborations & clarifications demonstrate high degree of congruence & next to no discernible misrepresentation. 
Here again is GenderGP responses. I could be wrong but it looks to me like they have edited the page since yesterday, with several new paragraphs gendergp.com/uk-media-promo…
Four claims GenderGP describes as "True" on website:
GenderGP provides ‘easy access’ to medicines to under-16s.
GenderGP provides puberty blockers to people as young as 10.
Not all patients need to speak to a doctor
GenderGP has prescribed hormones to patients as young as 12.
GenderGP provides ‘easy access’ to medicines to under-16s.
GenderGP provides puberty blockers to people as young as 10.
Not all patients need to speak to a doctor
GenderGP has prescribed hormones to patients as young as 12.
Where's the "fake news"?
Examples of three Telegraph claims which GenderGP quotes but refuses to deny.
1. "The clinic issued a prescription for a four-month supply of Testogel without seeking any parental consent or conducting any physical examination of the patient."
Examples of three Telegraph claims which GenderGP quotes but refuses to deny.
1. "The clinic issued a prescription for a four-month supply of Testogel without seeking any parental consent or conducting any physical examination of the patient."
2. "Gender GP did not ask to speak to an appropriate adult nor did it seek proof that any adult knew about the treatment."
3. "The counsellor involved in the consultation said that the child could potentially start on the puberty blockers four to six weeks after signing up with the clinic, and advised them not to use the NHS Tavistock clinic(s) because it would take far longer."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
