In courtesy of @MJonTheBrain, an article from September 1993. This is a very interesting tidbit. First of all, I am pretty sure Evan and Ray Chandler fed this story. They kept feeding tabloids throughout the whole 1993/94 case.
The way how you know it's them feeding it when they do, that it contains information only they could know about and variations of the same story then also pop up in their book in 2004.
I first saw a mention of Evan bugging Jordan's room in Ray Chandler's 2004 book All That Glitters. However, there the claim is that when Evan on July 16, 1993 tried to get Jordan "confirm" Evan's suspicion about the supposed abuse...
... at one point he tried to trick him by telling him he bugged his room, so he knows everything already and Jordan might as well "confess". To which Jordan remained unimpressed.
According to the book, Evan "lied to" Jordan about having bugged his room. But I always felt there was something more to that whole bugging story.
Knowing the how desperate Evan was to have something on MJ that he could use to blackmail him, it isn't far fetched that he really did bug Jordan's room. In his phone conversation with D. Schwartz on July 8, Evan also rants about supposed evidence in the form of "tape recordings"
However, no incriminating tapes ever showed up. Instead Evan/Ray say in their book that Evan just lied about bugging Jordan's room.
This early report from 1993 (in the first post of this thread above) however tells another version of this story. It tells that Evan really did bug Jordan's room, only he "burnt it" afterwards. This seems to be the original version of their bugging story.
Now, ask yourself, if it makes sense that he would burn it if it contained incriminating evidence against MJ? To get such evidence was the whole point of bugging the room.
The only reason he would destroy it if it didn't produce the evidence Evan wanted - or maybe even, to the contrary, it produced exculpatory evidence as it would have showed MJ did nothing inappropriate with Jordan while sleeping in the same room.
The fact that Jordan himself "remained unimpressed" when Evan claimed to him that he bugged his room and he "knows everything" would also point to the fact that nothing inappropriate ever happened.
Jordan only "confessed" (supposedly - I actually question the version of their story that Jordan "confessed" anything at all on July 16) when maniac Evan aggressively threatened him with bringing MJ down if Jordan didn't say what he wanted him to say.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justice for The Falsely Accused

Justice for The Falsely Accused Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliaBerkowitz1

26 Feb
The latest manipulation by the media is how they are trying to make everything about mysoginy. "There's only one true obstacle to controlling your own narrative in the press: being female". Yeah, ask Michael Jackson. @RollingStone Image
Not to mention the hypocrisy of lumping together Britney and Dylan Farrow. Dylan Farrow is now supposedly not in control of the media narrative because some are questioning the legitimacy of judging people by one-sided documentaries? And that's mysoginy?
I guess due process is mysoginy now. Reminds me of #metoo extremists who seriously call for the abolishing of presumption of innocence and burden of proof in courts in sexual assault cases!
Read 8 tweets
31 Jan
The reason why Safechuck had to throw in "threats and intimidation" among his claims was because during the probate court case that was a requirement to get around statutes.
So all of a sudden James started claiming that MJ "threatened and intimidated him" and that's why he didn't tell, even though it was in contradiction with his "love" narratives. But he is someone who will claim just anything that's required of him to claim at any given moment.
The "threatened and intimidated" narrative is in a declaration by Safechuck he gave in 2015 for the probate case. There the claim is that he did not come out all these years because MJ threatened and intimidated him. He needed to make that claim to try to get around statues.
Read 12 tweets
20 Dec 20
Otherness and Power: Michael Jackson and His Media Critics is a rather short book by Susan Woodword but it does a lot to expose "progressive" hypocrisy in the media and academia.

amazon.com/Otherness-Powe…
It analyzes three works:
- A 1985 book by Dave Marsh called "Trapped: Michael Jackson and the Crossover Dream"
- Maureen Orth's MJ articles in Vanity Fair
- And a 2009 book entitled The Resistible Demise of Michael Jackson, edited by British music critic Mark Fisher
I went back to the latter part today because I heard Fisher's name again in a completely different context (he was also a philosopher) and it kind of ringed a bell, so I checked back if he was really the dude who wrote some horrible book about MJ?
Read 12 tweets
18 Dec 20
The Jacksons' Destiny album turned 42 yesterday. Some of its songs are MJ's most biographical. Eg. Things I Do for You, Bless His Soul, That's What You Get (for Being Polite).

Songs like Things I Do for You remind me of the likes of Robson/Safechucks. It's sad that since a young age he had to face grifters like them.

Always wanting something for nothing
Especially what they don't deserve
Reaching in my pocket
I just got to stop it
Even though they got a lot of nerve
Am I in a bad situation
People taking me to the extreme
They don't use rejection
So I need protection
To keep my equity
Read 6 tweets
18 Dec 20
The claim of Safechuck being employed because he danced with MJ on stage would fail at latest during summary judgement when MJ's side would present evidence that the tour had nothing to do with MJ's companies (like they already mentioned that during the first appeal). Image
James clearly constructed his allegation with already lawyers by his side telling him that the story would need to be that the abuse started somehow under the companies. Thus he claimed the abuse started on the Bad Tour.
But at the time they probably didn't realize yet that the tour had nothing to do with the MJ companies. They probably assumed it was. So nice try, James, but it fails either way.
Read 6 tweets
9 Dec 20
It's almost as if Wade Robson is talking about himself here. His made up fantasy of being a sex abuse "victim" allows him to escape responsibility for his failure as a family bread winner and failure in his career.
BTW, Wade, unlike your act of being a "sex abuse victim", MJ's difference wasn't some kind of self-created fantasy to play victim. He objectively and provably had a very different life than most.
Wade takes things out of context. The book specifically states that here we are talking about an irrational, not real difference. Alan grew up normal, there was no reason for him to feel different or isolated,unlike for MJ who's life as a child was objectively different.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!