Since Al Franken is trending again, let's remember that the allegations against him were multiple, varied, and serious, that he admitted to misconduct before resigning, and that even his coworkers andallies have described a longtime pattern of inappropriate behavior.
And if you're going to come into my mentions to argue that Al Franken was railroaded out of office in a way that should serve as a cautionary tale, please read this thread first. He gave his colleagues no basis on which to support him. FOR WEEKS.
I thought Franken was a really strong senator, by the way. I did my bit to help him get elected in his first campaign. And no, I don't think what he did was as bad as what Trump has done. And yet.
He behaved inappropriately for a long time. He was warned by staff a decade before his resignation. And when the accusations started to pile up, he dithered for three weeks without offering a coherent defense or apology, then quit.
You may think it's bad that he quit, you may find some of the allegations against him unconvincing. (I find some of the allegations against him unconvincing!) But the facts are the facts. The record is the record. And that's where we need to start.
A lot of people are yelling "But Republicans don't hold their people accountable!" at me. Well, yeah. But Dems holding their people accountable is good in and of itself, and it also—I strongly believe—makes it easier to get rid of Republicans who do similar things.
Holding powerful people accountable for bad acts changes the culture, and it makes a difference at the ballot box. Roy Moore's 2017 loss didn't happen in a vacuum.
Plus, you know, the most notorious, most abject, most powerful sexual predator in American politics was driven from office just five weeks ago. That's not nothing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reading McNeil's posts, it does seem clear that he was pretty much fired, or at the very least that he quit in the face of a major, imminent, intentionally humiliating demotion.
But it's also really really clear that he should never have been assigned to that student trip to Peru, and that the fact that it blew up in his, and the Times', face was entirely foreseeable.
This is an extremely strange denial from Governor Cuomo. It ignores most of Lindsey Boylan's allegations, contradicts a claim that she didn't make, and offers a rebuttal from four staffers without so much as asserting that they're in a position to make such a rebuttal reliably.
Boylan makes a series of allegations against Cuomo today, and the only one his office denies specifically isn't close to being the most serious. And again, that one denial is highly misleading. medium.com/@lindseyboylan…
Cuomo's office says, as if it's somehow damning, that Boylan was never alone with Cuomo, a press aide, and a state trooper on a October 2017 flight. But she doesn't say she was, just that on the flight in question "His press aide was to my right and a state trooper behind us."
I love Casablanca with all my heart, but one of the main characters is an unrepentant serial rapist, and the movie treats it as a charming foible. Deeply fucked up! Not for everybody!
The Apartment is a stone-cold gem, but also very much not for everybody, for a bunch of reasons. The Little Fugitive? Astonishingly good. Many would find it completely boring. And that's okay.
I listened to Limbaugh some when I was young. What leaps out in memory is how unreliable he was—how obvious it always was that he wasn't giving an honest account of his own views, never mind those of his enemies.
He was a bigot and a bully, yes. Always. But he was also a *panderer*, constantly, obsequiously flattering his audience while encouraging them to revile and disrespect those they disagreed with.
I’ve asked Byers to clarify, but as I read this tweet, it seems that Bret Stephens included an unredacted use of the n-word in his column this week to make a point, and the column got spiked—maybe as a result?
For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.
You know what would be a great way for an outfit like @Slate to write about romance? Pair a romance reader with a romance skeptic, have the reader curate a novel for the skeptic to read, and run the conversation that ensues.
I've read a lot of romance novels for work and a fair number for fun, and you know what? The genre is VAST.
My favorite romance writer mostly sold her books to male-oriented pulp imprints, but the majority of them were lesbian romances set in the world of publishing and the arts in early-1960s Manhattan. And they're AMAZING.