Reading McNeil's posts, it does seem clear that he was pretty much fired, or at the very least that he quit in the face of a major, imminent, intentionally humiliating demotion.
But it's also really really clear that he should never have been assigned to that student trip to Peru, and that the fact that it blew up in his, and the Times', face was entirely foreseeable.
And yes, part of that is down to his views. But a bigger part is just a basic lack of 21st century cultural literacy. Don't send someone out to engage with teenagers as the public face of your newspaper if he's unable to do so without putting his foot in his mouth.
I can definitely see why he's pissed off that he was muzzled when he wanted to rebut the Daily Beast piece. But I'm not anywhere near as confident as he is that his that telling his side of the story would have worked out well for him.
And yeah, I can absolutely see why the knives were out for him behind closed doors at the Times. And I don't get the impression that he really understands it, even now.
Also, there's a weird multi-day gap in Donald McNeil's account between "I refused to quit" and "and so I quit." This Times quote suggests that those days may have been eventful ones.
Less than one percent of the cost of the bill. Manchin seems to be deciding that "occasionally being an asshole for no reason" is how he's going to make his mark between now and 2022.
And this really does seem to me to be a solid counterexample to the "Biden is using Manchin as a fig leaf to pursue his real goals" theory. (Which may well be legit in other contexts.)
There's no actual reason for anyone but Manchin to prefer the Manchin path here. It doesn't save money, create a better narrative, or target spending in any serious way. It's just a mechanism for Manchin to get a meaningless victory at the expense of Biden and the national party.
So since @conor64 has QTed this in a weird way, let me say a bit more about it. My claim isn't—I think CLEARLY isn't—that McNeil "harmed" the teenagers in any way. It's that he was a poor choice of ambassador because he's not good at communicating with young people of their ilk.
I don't think McNeil's big sin in the Peru story is being evil. I think that his big sin is being an out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus. And I say that as someone with out-of-touch self-satisfied old doofus tendencies myself.
When McNeil showed up in Peru quoting Tom Lehrer, making Jewish mother jokes, and saying "but what about blackface when BLACK people use it in AFRICA?", it was pretty much inevitable that he was going to come off as an annoying old weirdo.
Since Al Franken is trending again, let's remember that the allegations against him were multiple, varied, and serious, that he admitted to misconduct before resigning, and that even his coworkers andallies have described a longtime pattern of inappropriate behavior.
And if you're going to come into my mentions to argue that Al Franken was railroaded out of office in a way that should serve as a cautionary tale, please read this thread first. He gave his colleagues no basis on which to support him. FOR WEEKS.
I thought Franken was a really strong senator, by the way. I did my bit to help him get elected in his first campaign. And no, I don't think what he did was as bad as what Trump has done. And yet.
This is an extremely strange denial from Governor Cuomo. It ignores most of Lindsey Boylan's allegations, contradicts a claim that she didn't make, and offers a rebuttal from four staffers without so much as asserting that they're in a position to make such a rebuttal reliably.
Boylan makes a series of allegations against Cuomo today, and the only one his office denies specifically isn't close to being the most serious. And again, that one denial is highly misleading. medium.com/@lindseyboylan…
Cuomo's office says, as if it's somehow damning, that Boylan was never alone with Cuomo, a press aide, and a state trooper on a October 2017 flight. But she doesn't say she was, just that on the flight in question "His press aide was to my right and a state trooper behind us."
I love Casablanca with all my heart, but one of the main characters is an unrepentant serial rapist, and the movie treats it as a charming foible. Deeply fucked up! Not for everybody!
The Apartment is a stone-cold gem, but also very much not for everybody, for a bunch of reasons. The Little Fugitive? Astonishingly good. Many would find it completely boring. And that's okay.
I listened to Limbaugh some when I was young. What leaps out in memory is how unreliable he was—how obvious it always was that he wasn't giving an honest account of his own views, never mind those of his enemies.
He was a bigot and a bully, yes. Always. But he was also a *panderer*, constantly, obsequiously flattering his audience while encouraging them to revile and disrespect those they disagreed with.