No surprise to see Republicans who dismissed stories of Donald Trump's harrassing women jump on the allegations against Andrew Cuomo.

No surprise to see Democrats who welcomed charges against Republicans urge that we need to investigate before believing charges against Cuomo.
We'll hear a lot about motives (especially partisan ones) and a renewed debate on how we should initially treat allegations and view the people who make them.

None of this was hard to predict.
This will become a political football. and that means that larger issues will be obscured.

Sexual harassment is wrong, period. It's not boys just being boys, and it isn't always boys doing it or women being targeted.
Before you rush to conclusions, a little exercise is in order.

Perhaps the best way for folks to ponder how best to deal with the issue of how we handle such allegations is a very simple one.
1. How would you feel if you were the person making the allegation as a victim?

2. How would you feel if you were the person being accused--and, you believe, wrongly so?
You will find it challenging to set up a process that's fair, impartial, and seeks justice if you consider being the accuser and the accused.
Finally ...

Drop the discussion about motive. Determining (or alleging) motive may tell us why someone says something, but it doesn't determine whether the charge is true or false.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brooks D. Simpson

Brooks D. Simpson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrooksDSimpson

1 Mar
The refounding of the American republic in 1787-88 was made possible by major concessions to southern slaveholding interests. The three-fifths rule gave the South artificial advantages in the House and the electoral college.
It was no accident that the presidency and the Supreme Court were bulwarks of the slave power, along with the desire to maintain a free state-slave state balance in the Senate.
Three other early safeguards eventually cracked.

1. The House eventually reflected population growth in the North and the West, allowing free states to control the House.
Read 32 tweets
16 Oct 20
My bottom four presidents remain the same ... Pierce, Buchanan, A. Johnson, and Trump, with AJ and the Donald in the finals.
President who is sliding down? Andrew Jackson. Upward and onward? Grant, although perhaps too far in the opposite direction.
Presidential reputation remains shaped primarily by biographers and historians. Ask Truman and Eisenhower. Ask JFK and LBJ.
Read 12 tweets
22 Sep 20
We will hear a lot today about the anniversary of the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, issued by Abraham Lincoln on September 22, 1862.

It's often confused with the Emancipation Proclamation itself, which was issued on January 1, 1863.
All too often the former is read in light of the latter, if indeed it is read at all. Anyone who reads them both will see real differences between them in a number of areas.

That practice warps our understanding of how freedom came and the context in which it evolved.
The PEP (for the 9/22/62 document) is best understood as a document of reconstruction based on reconciliationist premises that contained a threat of revolution should reconciliation fail again.

Had white southerners accepted its terms, history would be far different.
Read 19 tweets
21 Sep 20
In the spring of 1971 I attended my first Rangers practice. Afterwards, as #BobNevin and @rodgilbert7 got onto a red sports car, Nevin gave me my first autograph from an NHL player (Rod would sign plenty of things later, but I didn't get his autograph then).
That spring was a memorable one for Nevin, as his OT goal in Game 6 won the first playoff series the Rangers had won in years ... and it beat his old team, the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Go to 21:50 here to see it:

As a Rangers fan at the time, to win a playoff series was a big thing. I believe it was the first time @rodgilbert7 was on the winning side of the handshake line.

RIP, Bob Nevin.
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep 20
What will make the impending presidential election notable is that it will remind us of how the Electoral College has shaped national politics since 1800 and how we have debated the legitimacy of election results (see 1876, 2000).
Prior to 1860, the impact of the 3/5 rule on the allocation of electoral votes favored the South, resulting in a presidency and a Supreme Court where southerners held disproportionate power (remember who nominates justices, right?).
In 1860, however, the Electoral College secured a victory for Abraham Lincoln, who did not manage to get even 40% of the popular vote.

It also helped Republicans fare well in presidential elections from 1876 through 1892, after Democrats' voter suppression reduced black voting.
Read 9 tweets
17 Sep 20
At least @POTUS is honest about @realDonaldTrump's desire to return to a narrative of triumph, progress, and celebration.

The culture wars continue.
Ironically, he accuses "the left" of the same practices of silencing and bullying opposition that he practices.

The projection is almost too obvious.
As expected, Howard Zinn and the #1619Project are the primary exhibits of far left conspiracies.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!