Question for Trump. You say you lost because the Democrats cheated. OK, suppose they did. You were the President of the US, the most powerful man on earth and you were not able to do anything about it, except sending a bunch of pathetic freaks to try to stage this grotesque coup
that the Keystone Cops would have been ashamed to be associated with. And you made your lunatic tools persuade your gullible idiot followers that the “Space Force” would save the day for you.
You were the Commander in Chief yet the military openly showed contempt for you
(remember General Malley’s speech?) and again you could do nothing, even though you used to claim that you were such a strong leader the military would do whatever you order them, even commit war crimes (“kill the families of terrorists). In fact, you were pathetically weak.
So now, why should anyone )except the most zombie-like among your followers) think that next time it will be any different? If the Democrats cheated last time, who will stop them doing it again? You won’t even have the huge advantage of incumbency. All your appointees to the
“deep state” will now be purged, and quite likely your businesses will be ruined. If you run, you are certainly going to lose again & your whining will no longer even have the interest of novelty - it will be the same old whining of a predictable old loser. Not that I actually
believe you will run. Secretly you know all these things, you know that the next defeat will destroy whatever hold you have over your “base” and it’s better to monetize it while it can still be done. Which is what I am sure you are already doing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

2 Mar
I will be happily uncharitable on Gorbachev’s 90th birthday.
First, a quote from Vladimir Bukovsky (it’s on YouTube but I am quoting from memory). When Bukovsky was at some conference at which Gorbachev was also present, Alexander Yakovlev asked him: “Have you talked with
Gorbachev?” “No” - answered Bukovsky. “Why not” - asked Yakovlev. “Because he always lies”. “Yes” - said Yakovlev, “we used to say, Gorbachev lies even when he is telling the truth”.
Bukovsky tells of how he convinced Mrs Thatcher that Gorbachev was a liar. He showed her a
document signed by Gorbachev authorizing the transfer of a million pounds to the British miners. She was shocked. “I heard a rumor about that” she said, “so I asked him directly. And he completely denied it”. That was already after Gorbachev was out of power & had no political
Read 8 tweets
7 Feb
It was not something that ever happened in any other armies, even though, of course, the method of “burning bridges behind’ goes back to very ancient times (that was, for example, what Robert Guiscard did before fighting the Byzantines in Sicily). But what the Soviets did was
pure terror for the sake of terror - and that was what Stalin wanted. And it did not make anyone fight better. The most famous practitioner of this terror, often used to cover his own failings was General (later Marshal) Zhukov. And it was not only in WWII, in Khalkin Gol he
started by executing officers right and left for no reason at all. This who don’t want to believe it, should read the memoirs of a general Grigorienko, who was there. Or my thread, which is a translation of a YouTube talk of Victor Suvorov, which quotes not only Grigirienko but
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
This review of Bill Gates’ latest book says everything about the character of its author. Anybody who followed his career in leading the tiny Microsoft to the dominant position in American corporate world will not find anything surprising here. As Steve
forbes.com/sites/tilakdos…
Steve Jobs said about Gates, he doesn’t care about what he is doing only about succeeding. As fewer and fewer people now remember, Gates was not someone who started in a garage (as Woźniak and Jobs did). His mother was a powerful IBM executive, from whom Bill found that IBM
needed an operating system for their forthcoming PC. Bill happened to know a small company which had just what IBM needed - he bought it from them for what turned out to be peanuts and licensed to IBM. IBM, of course, did not ultimately come out very well out of this saga. Anyway
Read 5 tweets
7 Feb
@moutet This is actually a distortion because it assigns far too great significance too having received two does vs one does. Actually, the head of FDA’s Vaccine Research Konstantin Chumakov in an interview was asked about the significance of getting two doses vs one and said, it was
@moutet much smaller than many people believe. This is what he said (I am now quoting from memory, the interview is on youtube in Russian). During the meeting at which emergency use of the Pfizer vaccine was approved, the question was asked: why do you have two doses rather than one if
@moutet your tests seem to show that one dose is already fully effective. And the answer was: this decision was made before we had the results on effectiveness of the vaccine. Because mRNA vaccines cannot be stored (unlike some other kinds of vaccines), if one dose proved ineffective it
Read 6 tweets
7 Feb
Many people seem to be confused about the attitude the West should take to Navalny. Navalny is a hugely admirable figure in many ways but he is not a Western agent and the Wesy should not help the Putin regime to present him as such. Instead it should say to Russia:
you have demonstrated that you don’t respect your own laws - we will therefore treat you as a lawless country. You have demonstrated that you don’t keep your obligations - we shall take account if this. You have shown that your officials are thieves and crooks and your
“journalists” mere propagandists, & the money your oligarchs put in our banks and with which they spend in our countries is not legally their.
You security services engage in murder both in Russia outside - we will regard them as criminal organisations.
These are the right
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
OK, so now I will stick my neck out and make a prediction for the next four years and not one that I am happy to make.
I predict that during the next 4 years we will see many setbacks for human rights in various parts of the world, intensification of repression & perhaps even
large scale killing, maybe war. And that in thus respect the situation will be worse during Biden’s presidency than it was during Trump’s - in other words, it’s going to be exactly the opposite than people like @Kasparov63 suggested (perhaps only implicitly). And here are my
reasons why Biden will be worse for human rights world wide and better for dictators that Trump was.
I will start by granting @Kasparov63 and others that Trump never cared one bit for “human rights”, he probably does not know what the phrase means. And perhaps Biden does care, he
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!