My dude had a yearlong global pandemic where the world essentially shut down and he still didn't do it. And he kept promising, too.
Look at the date on this. LOOK AT IT.
I just want him to have the guts and the honesty with himself and his fans to say "this is on indefinite hold. I may finish it and I may not and if it happens, it'll happen when it happens." Stop keeping the people who care on the hook. That just sucks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Finally getting around to this. It's very nice. Packs a wide punch in the "mid" area of the palate (not too deep, not too bright). Has a really long tail and a complex aftertaste.
A thing I've noticed about 100+ proof bourbons is that the really good ones can mask how high the proof is with the flavor. Cheapo high-proof whiskey just tastes like Everclear that had oak chips soaking in it.
I still have my Elijah Craig barrel proof B520, which is 127 proof, that I haven't opened yet. That will be its ultimate test, but the small batch EC is such a flavor bomb that I feel like it'll pass this test easily.
For fuck's sake - tell people the ways in which their lives will improve after they get vaccinated, not the ways in which their lives will stay exactly the same. What the hell is wrong with your brains???
I guarantee that these recommendations will include more things that people CAN'T do than things they CAN.
It obviously makes sense to tell vaccinated people to keep following local safety regulations because there's no way to tell who is or isn't vaccinated, but the focus should be that getting vaccinated should make you feel way more confident about neither getting it nor giving it.
I think the two main factors driving covid pessimism and gaslighting are: 1. An attempt to scare people into being cautious; and 2. The fear of the political toll of optimism that'll turn out to have been misplaced. Misplaced pessimism isn't as politically risky.
Trying to scare people is backfiring horribly because they keep preaching more severe measures (like double masking) when things are objectively improving with repeated good news regarding vaccines. It's creating a dissonance that ends up backfiring.
I see a tweet that says "new study shows vaccine reduces transmission risk 90%" and the very next tweet is "health officials say don't change any behaviors after getting vaccinated." It's getting really nutty at this point.
"Wow, that's not good but we're still flying normally and this is a Boeing 777, which is designed to fly using only one engine in a pinch, so we're probably going in for an emergency landing and this will most likely just be a cool story I tell people later."
Here's the thing about modern aviation - don't worry about how bad something looks. Worry about how bad something feels. If the engine is on fire but the plane is still flying normally, that's less scary than no engines on fire and the plane bucking and doing steep banks.
Over the ocean this situation would have scared me for sure. It being not long after takeoff and you being able to safely turn around and land is a big factor.
Gina Carano made a dumb Holocaust analogy (a national pass time these days) but calling it anti-Semitic reeks of the same annoying edginess that inspires dumb Holocaust comparisons to begin with. Stop reaching for the worst thing you can think of to bolster your arguments.
Someone asked me about the tendency to compare things to the Holocaust yesterday and here was my response:
Not to mention that street violence didn't put Hitler in power. Causing deliberate deadlock in the Reichstag and essentially manipulating Hindenburg into appointing him Chancellor under false pretenses is what put Hitler in power, so the slippery slope argument doesn't hold here.