How much does the EU and how much does each member state have to do to achieve the agreed vaccination target (70% of the adult population fully vaccinated by 21st September)?
A short thread 👇, first the results then some discussion of the calulations.

💉🇪🇺
1/8
Starting with the EU, the graph shows that in the 205 days left, a tad over 0.5% of the (total) population needs to get a jab every day. The current rate is a little under 0.2 per day. This implies a needed acceleration by a factor of around 2.7 (right-hand scale).
2/8
Comparing countries, Malta is an outlier, barely needing to accelerate at all (by 4%), whereas Belgium must raise its recent poor performance more than four-and-a-half times. 21 countries need to at least double the rate at which jabs are administered to meet the target.
3/8
The 3 largest MS, DE, FR, IT, all have an above-average amount of homework to do. Germany needs to treble its vaccination rate. On the whole, southern and eastern MS face a smaller vaccination-acceleration challenge.
4/8
The needed jab rate is determined by the no. of vaccines delivered so far and the % of adults in the population. The differences between MS are not large, so that the needed rate does vary, but only between 0.47 and 0.56. Still, 🇩🇪needs to hit 0.53/day, 🇫🇷 only 0.49 for ex.
5/8
This means that the finding for the "acceleration factor" is driven mostly by the recent vaccination rate. Country performance here can move around fairly sharply (even using 7-day averages), so country rankings of the needed acceleration could change fairly swiftly.
6/8
The findings can be taken as upper bounds bc I have assumed that 2 shots are needed for full vaccination; the soon to be approved Janssen vaccine needs only 1. And the rate for the last 7 days in most cases slightly lags the current pace, which is rising in most countries.
7/8
Sources: @EU_Eurostat (population) @OurWorldInData (vaccinations)

tl:dr Europe has its work cut out for it to hit its💉target. But as the supply constraint eases, it's do-able. Some MS have more to do than others

@SDullien @fsaraceno @Ole_Funke @OlafGersemann @LaszloAndorEU
8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Watt

Andrew Watt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewWattEU

12 May 20
Devastating, incredibly prophetic quotes from the dissenting opinion in the #GCC 2014 ruling on #OMT (in German).

tldr in English: do *not* fall for the line that the German constitution obliged the #BVerfG to rule as it did.

1/4
Rather there has been a persistent effort over an extended to open up the legal space to make the recent ruling possible.

Let me unoffically translate one long sentence (written, to repeat, in 2014) which encapsulates what is problematic about last week's ruling:

2/4
"That a few independent German judges, basing themselves on the German interpretation of the democracy principle and on the limits this and our interpretation of A123ff TFEU set on the legitimate powers of the independent ECB, take a decision with incalculably far-reaching...
3/4
Read 4 tweets
4 May 20
Useful thread with links on the upcoming ruling by the German Constitutional Court #BVerfG.
What is not sufficently emphasised imho is the risk to the entire legal framework of the EU. It's not just a matter of EMU. The primacy and thus the consistency of EU law is at stake.
1
If countries can subvert agreed EU procedures and institutions, on which the highest EU court, the ECJ, has made a ruling, using national (constitutional) courts, & deriving a legitimacy from their own national constitutions, we are on a slippery slope indeed.
2
Update based on first report of the decision (spiegel.de/wirtschaft/ezb…)
We are indeed on a slippery slope. Let us be clear: The GCC (a majority of 7:1 judges) is of the opinion that the ECJ has made an error in interpreting EU law. This is not just a technical mon pol issue.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!