Much has been made of the “10x Engineer,” but I am here to tell you of another kind of ultra-valuable startup employee, the “Angel Employee.”
(1/x)
The Angel Employee is someone who has already had a significant exit but is so dedicated to their craft that they are willing to saddle up again and join your startup, volunteering to take a steep cut in salary, in return for an expanded equity package.
Angel Employees are often high-performing employees who were early and critical in the their last startup. They have confidence in their own ability to add real value quickly, hence their willingness to bet on themselves and your mission.
Angel Employees are disproportionately beneficial because the salary/equity tradeoff they ask for is like getting an additional $50-100k in angel investment per year PLUS the talents of someone who’s a proven quantity, working on building your startup’s product and business.
(Note: if we want to be strict about this, I differentiate between Angel Employees and Founders who take little/no salary, who may be similar but aren’t the point I’m trying to make here)
I’d say, “Try to hire as many of these people as you can” (similar to the “hire 10x engineers” advice) but it’s tough to actively recruit someone with the explicit intention of ASKING them to take a lower salary.
You typically recruit someone like this expecting to pay full salary (since they are great), and then they surprise you by volunteering on their own when you get to the offer negotiation stage.
I have been surprised and honored by everyone who’s joined our team who has volunteered to do this, as it’s a real vote of confidence in the importance of our mission, and a low-key way of flexing by showing a quiet and sure confidence in their own abilities.
I know early Facebook had at least one such employee (possibly two; I wasn’t privy to her salary), and both of those people were incredibly critical to the later success of the company.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What if I told you that I had created a low-cost, self-replicating, carbon capture device nearly 10x more efficient than anything else you can purchase at scale today?
… and that it could be powered solely using light (real or artificial) and mere water (which I can make using more light)
… and that we already had a thousand customized variants adapted for localized usage and ready for immediate installation anywhere in the world
I think the legal compromise on the platform-rights/censorship-bad issue could be to require that platforms make it easy-possible to download all content a user has ever created/uploaded to that platform, even (especially) after the user is banned.
Back in the aughts, we called this “data portability,” but in those days it was just a cudgel Google tried to use to break into Facebook’s walled garden to get at user info they so desperately wanted for themselves.
However, enabling data portability would preserve platform owners’ right to run them as they see fit (allowing or banning users for any reason whatsoever) - a right that I am sympathetic to, having run a platform myself.
Here’s how it works: any controversial event on a social platform also involves a 10-100x increase in general activity and user “passion” levels. It’s a very interesting and popular event, regardless of political/social alignment (right, left, whatever).
At ALL times on social platforms, there’s a low ambient incidence of rule-breaking behavior (e.g. 0.1% of users). These users or subreddits get banned when it is detected; nobody gives it a second thought - it’s fairly routine.
Because controversial events have orders of magnitudes more activity, it is nearly guaranteed that SOMEONE is going to do something bad. It usually doesn’t have anything to do with the “issue,” people just get wild/angry and out of control.
Let me offer a framework for thinking about things like this, something called an “Omega Event.”
It was first described to me by Erik Martin, one of Reddit's first community managers:
In governance, Omega Events exist due to the fact that no system of beliefs, no worldview, no set of rules, can account for everything that will ever happen.
I heard a great phrase awhile ago: "Cargo Cult Lockdown." Originally the guy who mentioned it was referring to how countries were imitating China's lockdown, but would fail to understand the details, methods, and follow-up needed to allow for successful subsequent opening-up.
(If you don't know what "cargo cult" refers to, here is a primer from Feynman's speech where he explains it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cul… )
But now I see it over and over as people point to this or that country (eg Japan, Sweden, SG, HK, Germany) as their example for whatever path forward their politically-aligned sphere seems to currently prefer.
HAPE symptoms similar to covid: "HAPE was misdiagnosed for centuries, as evidenced by frequent reports of young, vigorous men suddenly dying of “pneumonia” within days of arriving at high altitude."
"Early symptoms of HAPE include a subtle nonproductive cough, dyspnoea on exertion and reduced exercise performance. As HAPE progresses, cough worsens and the subject may have a debilitating degree of dyspnoea, even at rest."
HAPE's mechanism results from low amounts of ambient atmospheric oxygen, so the subject's blood is unable to bring enough oxygen to the body.
Nothing is "attacking" the lungs, but the lungs show similar inflammatory symptoms to covid, because O2 in blood is low.