1/ Dear @ScottMorrisonMP it’s long but here’s Another Way to respond to rape allegations 1. Demonstrate true compassion for the victim & her family 2. Invite other potential victims to come fwd in a private
& safe way 3. Encourage current staffers to feel safe to report with a
a guarantee of no reprisals 4. Offer psychological support for family & friends of victim 5. Reassure the public you take this seriously & will leave no stone unturned 6. Remind the public violence against violence women will not be tolerated 7. Launch investigation into
The obstacles were stopping the victim from coming forward & demonstrate a desire to address said obstacles 8. Never say it’s “he said/ she said” when it’s obviously more than that 9. Enlist independent investigators 10. Be open about rships with police mates @motorcymick
11. Remain neutral if you have to but don’t categorically accept the words of a potential rapist 12. Acknowledge the unacceptably high rates of sexual assault in Australia 13. Don’t smirk 14. Don’t treat women who challenge you with contempt & disrespect @anneconnollyabc
15. Create a Taskforce with at least 50% women -with the aim of ensuring a safe working environment for all your staff 16. Develop a pathway for those reporting violence & those receiving those reports on how to manage this in a trauma informed way
1/12 The person whose details Neil Punchard illegally obtained & GAVE to her abuser, was at risk.
1.She had left him
2.She was pregnant
3.She was female
4.She had children
She had been to court about his abuse before.
Everything about her was high risk. @cait__kelly
2/12 All people who are responding to victims of abuse need to know the basics.
A police officer - law enforcement- needs to know this ...when 2/5 of the assaults they record are family violence related.
Police ought to know this when it is their core business. @Drhutch2011
1/7 Do you even read your own links Joe? Read the article again, but slowly this time, with your glasses on. You have completely (deliberately?) misread the article in order to foist your false narrative on others. Dr. Read said nothing of the sort & if he played your game he
2/ 7 Would be demanding a public apology or threatening legal action. Let me quote from the article YOU posted:
“The Arson Emergency narrative is a bad faith argument spotlighting ignition (what starts the fire) over condition (what keeps the fire burning and makes it spread)”
3/7 Read told Mashable over email that he's "angered" to see commentators "twist" reported research into ignition statistics, or to use them to gloss over the environmental factors affecting the spread and intensity of fires, no matter how they're lit.