"What's the Objective of Atheism" asked in a group.

There is no objective of #atheism.

In philosophy of religion its usually understood as the proposition gods do not exist. The #atheist believes this proposition true.

Colloquially it is understood as a lack of belief in gods.
There is, however, #atheist activism which seeks #secular society. This can be referred to as anti-theism rather than #atheism though.

Anti-theism, in the strongest sense, is the belief no one should be theist (believe in gods).
There are some today who conflate philosophical atheism (belief gods do not exist) with anti-theism.

If that were true & the anti- prefix doesn't mean against/opposing and means belief not:

Antivaxxers believe vaccines don't exist
Antiabortionists believe abortions don't exist
I think this anti-theism conflation comes because of the commonly used philosopy of religion definition being "the belief gods do not exist" and because the colloquial definition has shoehorned anything that "lacks a belief" as an atheist, they've also had to rebrand anti-theism.
The funny thing is, this use of anti-theism isn't even how the often celebrated Christopher Hitchens used it.

Quoted below, this isn't just a belief gods do not exist, he maintained the belief that religion is harmful, and thus is an anti-theist...
Now, folks can identify how they like, but it does bother me when folks say "atheism is only" or tell me I am an "anti-theist" due to some weird redefining of the word.

I also prefer concise and precise language.

I don't find broad terminology that useful.
You're free to conflate all non-theists with atheists

And you can apply that to other things too... Consider though, do you regard

All non-brits, American?
All non-dogs, cats?
All non-humans, pigs?
All non-fords, Ferrari's?
All non-cars, boats?

Or are there more precise terms?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Answers in Reason

Answers in Reason Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @answersinreason

20 Feb
Normatively Atheist: in this article I hope to describe (and provide links to) what is meant by normative, and how this can apply to our reasoning to what is considered the #normative or most #logical #definition of #atheist answers-in-reason.com/philosophy/nor…
I've said language is descriptive and people are free to identify how they like a number of times, but when discussing definitions I speak of the normative (answers-in-reason.com/philosophy/epi…) or most logical.
This can be met with some hostility, with people often telling me I am the one being illogical or that I don't understand what normative means, with some rejecting how normative is used in philosophy with a preference to a colloquial use.
Read 46 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!