It's remarkable that compared to #NYTimes who reads like a notebook of evolution denier Lysenko, Stalin's favored "scientist", #AmericanReneissance reads like a peer reviewed science journal as for content, arguments, & accuracy in #HBD (human biodiversity) related content (!).
Having read tens of AmRen articles, I've not discovered pure racisim. It's been scientifically informed, utilitarian & logical albeit at times blunt population level analysis & worry about the West's outgroup favoritism - not discrimination against any given individual.
I'm finding their human biodiversity articles - many written by true giants in the fields of relevant sciences - and book reviews very high quality. They DO NOT DISTORT UNDERLYING SCIENCE. That's most important, regardless of their ideas of what to do based on those common facts.
P.S. but this steel manning is what to expect from the right whereas straw manning & distortions are to be expected from the left. There's a striking difference in the levels of honor, dignity, & sense of fairness b/w these culture war sides. (I belong to neither one)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
