You know, come to think of it, my friend and co-author @kevinguilfoile had our book, "My First Presidentiary: A Scrapbook of George W. Bush" "cancelled" because of politics back in 2001. Hear me out. amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg…
The book was a rather gentle parody of GW Bush, released right around the inauguration in 2001. It sold reasonably well, was a #1 Washington Post best seller, a campus best seller, and was a nice little success story.
After 9/11, every single remaining copy, 10's of thousands of them, were returned from bookstores to the publishers because it was decided, sensibly, that the public appetite for a parody of the president in the aftermath of a terrorist attack on American soil was limited.
The royalty statement for 4th quarter of 2001 was something else, I'll tell you what. Sometime in November I remember getting notice that they were taking the book out of print, and we could buy as many copies as we wanted for $1 a piece.
Before the year was out, every returned copy was "pulped," literally destroyed because of some law that taxes the inventory, which incentivizes publishers to get rid of books they think won't sell.
It was disappointing, but I don't think either of us questioned it for a second. The thought of peddling the book after 9/11 seemed wrong. With time, that sense has faded, but so had the moment for the book, oh well.
If taking a book out of print is getting cancelled, I've been cancelled lots of times by multiple publishers, without even having a chance to protest!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Arguing that well-resourced private universities should give money to less-resourced public ones is a clever frame for an argument, but of course, the real solution is to end the favorable tax structures for wealthy privates and put the money in publics. chronicle.com/article/what-w…
Collecting taxes from the wealthy and distributing it to the schools that actually educate most students is what I call for in my book. Look at these disparities. beltpublishing.com/collections/pr…
I get that tax the wealthy and give the money to the public goods that people actually need and use isn't a sexy argument that gets attention or allows me to display my perfect straddling of progressive and centrist takes at my well-paid Substack, but it would, you know, work.
Yesterday, I was among the many folks on here tweeting with some distress over the news that U. Colorado is replacing tenured faculty with NTT instructors to deal with budget shortfalls. I actually have a bit of a different take today. I think it could be a positive step. /thread
This @insidehighered article from the dogged @ColleenFlahert1 provided some very important additional context. Faculty are being bought out voluntarily and those positions replaced with instructors who will teach twice as much. insidehighered.com/news/2020/12/0…
I think this comment from one of CU-Boulder's tenured profs is at the crux of the criticism. Such a move is not consistent with what he (and many) perceive as the mission of a research university.
Succinct summary from @ErikLoomis of what's at play in higher ed right now, particularly public higher ed. It's an acceleration of the trends of the last 30 years, and if we don't act, it could be the end times. lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/12/shock-…
I did my best to offer a vision that moves us away from this precipice in Sustainable. Resilient. Free.: The Future of Public Higher Education. beltpublishing.com/products/susta…
In the post at the top of the thread, @ErikLoomis nails the disconnect at work.
When I sat down to consider writing what would become Why They Can't Write, I thought it would be a book of pedagogy, an articulation of a particular philosophy towards teaching writing and then the practical application of that philosophy. I soon realized that wasn't sufficient.
As I considered the "problem" of teaching writing, I became more and more concerned about the atmosphere and conditions under which students were attempting to learn. These things appeared fundamentally hostile to the goals I have for students in learning to write.
For ex., one of the most important skills for a writer is the development of "agency," the notion that you have control over your message and messaging, and that your work can influence others. It is a belief in the efficacy of writing in general and your own writing in specific.
So BookExpo is no more. I've got a nearly 50 year personal history with the event, going back to its progenitor, the American Bookseller's Association annual meeting. Thoughts that may turn into something someday. publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/in…
My mom owned an independent bookstore and would travel to the convention most years in the 70's and 80's. I remember those weeks as the one time of the year where Dad was in charge of the kids. Once we ran out of pre-made meals, dinner was at Dairy Queen.
There was a year when the ABA was in Atlanta, before PopRocks were available in Illinois and my mom filled her suitcase with a supply of the stuff to bring home to my brother and I.
Cannot recommend this dissection of how the media is blowing it again from @JamesFallows enough. It covers a lot of ground, and not only diagnoses the problem, but offers solutions. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Fallows' analogy to Mueller's approach is spot on. The press is playing by rules largely of its own invention that Trump and others (like Barr) recognize as phantoms, and easily gamed. If outlets don't respond to this, they will continue to get played.
The specific examples that @JamesFallows uses to critique press tics like both sides-ism and horse-race-ism, should be taught in schools, and not just to journalists. They exemplify the critical thinking all writers should be comfortable doing.